NDLI: “Leaping Poodle” (Springender Pudel) : Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) 2 April 2015

Please wait, while we are loading the content...

“Partially Reflecting Sheeting” (Teilreflektierende Folie) : Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) 15 September 2015 – Case No. X ZR 112/13

“SBS Belgium” : Decision of the European Court of Justice (Ninth Chamber) 19 November 2015 – Case No. C-325/14

“Iron & Smith” : Decision of the European Court of Justice (Fourth Chamber) 3 September 2015 – Case No. C-125/14

“Leaping Poodle” (Springender Pudel) : Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) 2 April 2015 – Case No. I ZR 59/13

“Central Negotiating Mandate – Press Wholesalers” (Zentrales Verhandlungsmandat) : Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) 6 October 2015 – Case No. KZR 17/14

Comment on “Central Negotiating Mandate” : Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) 6 October 2015 – Case No. KZR 17/14

Johannes Pitz, Atsushi Kawada and Jeffrey A Schwab: Patent Litigation in Germany, Japan and the United States: A Practitioner’s Guide

IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law : Volume 47, Issue 2, March 2016

IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law : Volume 47, Issue 1, February 2016

IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law : Volume 46

IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law : Volume 45

IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law : Volume 44

“Leaping Poodle” (Springender Pudel) : Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) 2 April 2015 – Case No. I ZR 59/13

Content Provider	Springer Nature Link
Copyright Year	2016
Abstract	1. If, in a sign composed of a word and a figure, the composition of the overall appearance, the arrangement of the trade mark’s components and the beginning of the word are identical with a well-known combined mark (here: the figurative component of a leaping animal from the same perspective, in the same posture, facing the same direction), one can assume a figurative similarity between the signs. 2. The proprietor of a well-known trade mark can request the cancellation of a trade mark even if no risk of confusion is present but the similarities between the opposing signs are so great that the relevant public makes a mental association between the contested sign and the well-known trade mark. 3. A proprietor of a well-known mark protected by trade mark registration is not required to accept the establishment of trade mark protection in respect of identical or similar goods for a sign that infringes his trade mark right, even if the sign refers in a humorous manner to the well-known trade mark and as a trade mark parody falls within the scope of protection of artistic freedom.
Starting Page	358
Ending Page	364
Page Count	7
File Format	PDF
ISSN	00189855
Journal	IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law
Volume Number	47
Issue Number	3
e-ISSN	21950237
Language	English
Publisher	Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Publisher Date	2016-03-15
Publisher Place	Berlin, Heidelberg
Access Restriction	One Nation One Subscription (ONOS)
Subject Keyword	Parody International IT and Media Law, Intellectual Property Law Combined mark Well-known trade mark Trade mark registration Figurative similarity Risk of confusion
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Case study
Subject	Political Science and International Relations Law

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

“Langenscheidt Yellow” : Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) 18 September 2014 – Case No. I ZR 228/12

“BMW-Emblem” : Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) 12 March 2015 – Case No. I ZR 153/14

“BSA/DSA” : Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) 9 July 2015 – Case No. I ZB 16/14

“Himalayan Salt” (Himalaya Salz) : Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) 31 March 2016 – Case No. I ZR 86/13

“Stabilisation of Water Quality” (Stabilisierung der Wasserqualität) : Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) 3 February 2015 – Case No. X ZR 76/13

“Quetiapin” : Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) 13 January 2015 – Case No. X ZR 41/13

“Cooking Pan” (Kochgefäß) : Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) 13 January 2015 – Case No. X ZR 81/13

“Polymer Foam II” (Polymerschaum II) : Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) 9 June 2015 – Case No. X ZR 101/13

“Audio Signal Coding” (Audiosignalcodierung) : Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) 3 February 2015 – Case No. X ZR 69/13

“Leaping Poodle” (Springender Pudel) : Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) 2 April 2015 – Case No. I ZR 59/13

Similar Documents

“Langenscheidt Yellow” : Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) 18 September 2014 – Case No. I ZR 228/12

“BMW-Emblem” : Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) 12 March 2015 – Case No. I ZR 153/14

“BSA/DSA” : Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) 9 July 2015 – Case No. I ZB 16/14

“Himalayan Salt” (Himalaya Salz) : Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) 31 March 2016 – Case No. I ZR 86/13

“Stabilisation of Water Quality” (Stabilisierung der Wasserqualität) : Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) 3 February 2015 – Case No. X ZR 76/13

“Quetiapin” : Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) 13 January 2015 – Case No. X ZR 41/13

“Cooking Pan” (Kochgefäß) : Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) 13 January 2015 – Case No. X ZR 81/13

“Polymer Foam II” (Polymerschaum II) : Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) 9 June 2015 – Case No. X ZR 101/13

“Audio Signal Coding” (Audiosignalcodierung) : Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) 3 February 2015 – Case No. X ZR 69/13

“Leaping Poodle” (Springender Pudel) : Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) 2 April 2015 – Case No. I ZR 59/13