NDLI: Investigating eye movement acquisition and analysis technologies as a causal factor in differential prevalence of crossed and uncrossed fixation disparity during reading and dot scanning

Please wait, while we are loading the content...

Investigating eye movement acquisition and analysis technologies as a causal factor in differential prevalence of crossed and uncrossed fixation disparity during reading and dot scanning

Software for the automatic correction of recorded eye fixation locations in reading experiments

GazeParser: an open-source and multiplatform library for low-cost eye tracking and analysis

Electromagnetic tracking of motion in the proximity of computer generated graphical stimuli: A tutorial

Investigating the speed–accuracy trade-off: Better use deadlines or response signals?

Semantic diversity: A measure of semantic ambiguity based on variability in the contextual usage of words

Determinants of naming latencies, object comprehension times, and new norms for the Russian standardized set of the colorized version of the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures

English semantic word-pair norms and a searchable Web portal for experimental stimulus creation

Diphones-fr: A French database of diphone positional frequency

NIM: A Web-based Swiss army knife to select stimuli for psycholinguistic studies

Norms for grip agreement for 296 photographs of objects

CHull as an alternative to AIC and BIC in the context of mixtures of factor analyzers

Evaluating the robustness of repeated measures analyses: The case of small sample sizes and nonnormal data

Bayesian estimates of autocorrelations in single-case designs

SCA with rotation to distinguish common and distinctive information in linked data

Predictors of timed picture naming in Persian

Recurrence quantification analysis of eye movements

Bayesian Thurstonian models for ranking data using JAGS

The effect of skewness and kurtosis on the robustness of linear mixed models

SPSS and SAS programs for comparing Pearson correlations and OLS regression coefficients

Erratum to: SPSS and SAS programs for comparing Pearson correlations and OLS regression coefficients

Erratum to: Content-embedded tasks beat complex span for predicting comprehension

Erratum to: Calculating and graphing within-subject confidence intervals for ANOVA

Erratum to: Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30,000 English words

Erratum to: Imageability and body–object interaction ratings for 599 multisyllabic nouns

Erratum to: Assessing group-level participation in fluid teams: Testing a new metric

Behavior Research Methods : Volume 45, Issue 2, June 2013

Behavior Research Methods : Volume 45, Issue 1, March 2013

Behavior Research Methods : Volume 44

Behavior Research Methods : Volume 43

Behavior Research Methods : Volume 42

Behavior Research Methods : Volume 41

Behavior Research Methods : Volume 40

Behavior Research Methods : Volume 39

Behavior Research Methods : Volume 38

Behavior Research Methods : Volume 37

Behavior Research Methods : Volume 36

Behavior Research Methods : Volume 35

Behavior Research Methods : Volume 34

Behavior Research Methods : Volume 33

Behavior Research Methods : Volume 32

Behavior Research Methods : Volume 31

Behavior Research Methods : Volume 30

Behavior Research Methods : Volume 29

Investigating eye movement acquisition and analysis technologies as a causal factor in differential prevalence of crossed and uncrossed fixation disparity during reading and dot scanning

Content Provider	Springer Nature Link
Author	Kirkby, J. A. Blythe, H. I. Drieghe, D. Benson, V. Liversedge, S. P.
Copyright Year	2013
Abstract	Previous studies examining binocular coordination during reading have reported conflicting results in terms of the nature of disparity (e.g. Kliegl, Nuthmann, & Engbert (Journal of Experimental Psychology General 135:12-35, 2006); Liversedge, White, Findlay, & Rayner (Vision Research 46:2363-2374, 2006). One potential cause of this inconsistency is differences in acquisition devices and associated analysis technologies. We tested this by directly comparing binocular eye movement recordings made using SR Research EyeLink 1000 and the Fourward Technologies Inc. DPI binocular eye-tracking systems. Participants read sentences or scanned horizontal rows of dot strings; for each participant, half the data were recorded with the EyeLink, and the other half with the DPIs. The viewing conditions in both testing laboratories were set to be very similar. Monocular calibrations were used. The majority of fixations recorded using either system were aligned, although data from the EyeLink system showed greater disparity magnitudes. Critically, for unaligned fixations, the data from both systems showed a majority of uncrossed fixations. These results suggest that variability in previous reports of binocular fixation alignment is attributable to the specific viewing conditions associated with a particular experiment (variables such as luminance and viewing distance), rather than acquisition and analysis software and hardware.
Starting Page	664
Ending Page	678
Page Count	15
File Format	PDF
ISSN	07433808
Journal	Behavior Research Methods
Volume Number	45
Issue Number	3
e-ISSN	15543528
Language	English
Publisher	Springer US
Publisher Date	2013-01-24
Publisher Place	Boston
Access Restriction	One Nation One Subscription (ONOS)
Subject Keyword	Binocular coordination Eye movements Reading and nonreading tasks Cognitive Psychology
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Article
Subject	Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 3200/3201 Psychology

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

Investigating eye movement acquisition and analysis technologies as a causal factor in differential prevalence of crossed and uncrossed fixation disparity during reading and dot scanning

Do standard optometric measures predict binocular coordination during reading?

Reading text increases binocular disparity in dyslexic (2011).

Infants’ discrimination of crossed and uncrossed horizontal disparity

Disabled and Normal Readers' Eye Movements in Reading and Nonreading Tasks

Defining eye-fixation sequences across individuals and tasks: the Binocular-Individual Threshold (BIT) algorithm

The eye movements of pure alexic patients during reading and nonreading tasks

Effects of binocular disparity on impressions

Eye movements in reading versus nonreading tasks: Using E-Z Reader to understand the role of word/stimulus familiarity

Investigating eye movement acquisition and analysis technologies as a causal factor in differential prevalence of crossed and uncrossed fixation disparity during reading and dot scanning

Similar Documents

Investigating eye movement acquisition and analysis technologies as a causal factor in differential prevalence of crossed and uncrossed fixation disparity during reading and dot scanning

Do standard optometric measures predict binocular coordination during reading?

Reading text increases binocular disparity in dyslexic (2011).

Infants’ discrimination of crossed and uncrossed horizontal disparity

Disabled and Normal Readers' Eye Movements in Reading and Nonreading Tasks

Defining eye-fixation sequences across individuals and tasks: the Binocular-Individual Threshold (BIT) algorithm

The eye movements of pure alexic patients during reading and nonreading tasks

Effects of binocular disparity on impressions

Eye movements in reading versus nonreading tasks: Using E-Z Reader to understand the role of word/stimulus familiarity

Investigating eye movement acquisition and analysis technologies as a causal factor in differential prevalence of crossed and uncrossed fixation disparity during reading and dot scanning