NDLI: In defense of the signal detection interpretation of remember/know judgments

Content Provider	Springer Nature Link
Author	Wixted, John T. Stretch, Vincent
Copyright Year	2004
Abstract	Donaldson (1996) argued that remember/know judgments can be conceptualized within a signal detection framework by assuming that they are based on two criteria situated along a strength-of-memory decision axis. According to this model, items that exceed a high criterion receive a remember response, whereas items that only exceed a lower criterion receive a know response. Although a variety of findings have been presented in evidence against this idea, Dunn (2004) recently showed that detection theory is fully compatible with those findings. We present a variety of new results and new analyses that weigh strongly in favor of the detection interpretation. We further show that a dual-process account of recognition memory is compatible with a unidimensional detection model despite the common notion that such a model necessarily assumes a single process. The key assumption of this model is that individual recognition decisions are based on both recollection and familiarity (not on one process or the other).
Starting Page	616
Ending Page	641
Page Count	26
File Format	PDF
ISSN	10699384
Journal	Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Volume Number	11
Issue Number	4
e-ISSN	15315320
Language	English
Publisher	Springer-Verlag
Publisher Date	2004-01-01
Publisher Place	New York
Access Restriction	One Nation One Subscription (ONOS)
Subject Keyword	Cognitive Psychology
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Article
Subject	Experimental and Cognitive Psychology Arts and Humanities Developmental and Educational Psychology

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

In defense of the signal detection interpretation of remember/know judgments

The effect of testing procedure on remember-know judgments

Evaluating models of remember-know judgments: Complexity, mimicry, and discriminability

Remember-know judgments can depend on how memory is tested

Implicit word activation during prerecognition processing: False recognition and remember/know judgments

The detection model of recognition using know and remember judgments

Analysis of RT distributions in the remember—know paradigm

Interpreting the effects of response bias on remember-know judgments using signal detection and threshold models

The effect of testing procedure on remember-know judgments

In defense of the signal detection interpretation of remember/know judgments

Similar Documents

In defense of the signal detection interpretation of remember/know judgments

The effect of testing procedure on remember-know judgments

Evaluating models of remember-know judgments: Complexity, mimicry, and discriminability

Remember-know judgments can depend on how memory is tested

Implicit word activation during prerecognition processing: False recognition and remember/know judgments

The detection model of recognition using know and remember judgments

Analysis of RT distributions in the remember—know paradigm

Interpreting the effects of response bias on remember-know judgments using signal detection and threshold models

The effect of testing procedure on remember-know judgments

In defense of the signal detection interpretation of remember/know judgments