NDLI: Differences in the strength of distractor inhibition do not affect distractor

Please wait, while we are loading the content...

Memory & Cognition : Volume 45

Memory & Cognition : Volume 44

Memory & Cognition : Volume 43

Memory & Cognition : Volume 42

Memory & Cognition : Volume 41

Memory & Cognition : Volume 40

Memory & Cognition : Volume 40, Issue 8, November 2012

Memory & Cognition : Volume 40, Issue 7, October 2012

Memory & Cognition : Volume 40, Issue 6, August 2012

Memory & Cognition : Volume 40, Issue 5, July 2012

Memory & Cognition : Volume 40, Issue 4, May 2012

Memory & Cognition : Volume 40, Issue 3, April 2012

The role of stimulus type in list length effects in recognition memory

Production benefits both recollection and familiarity

Memory for target height is scaled to observer height

A bias to detail: how hand position modulates visual learning and visual memory

Visual mental image generation does not overlap with visual short-term memory: A dual-task interference study

Differences in the strength of distractor inhibition do not affect distractor–response bindings

Revisiting backward recall and benchmark memory effects: a reply to Bireta et al. (2010)

Contrast class cues and performance facilitation in a hypothesis-testing task: evidence for an iterative counterfactual model

Statistical judgments are influenced by the implied likelihood that samples represent the same population

Analogical transfer in perceptual categorization

Readers’ use of source information in text comprehension

Reading aloud pseudohomophones in Italian: Always an advantage

With the past behind and the future ahead: Back-to-front representation of past and future sentences

Bilingual recognition memory: Stronger performance but weaker levels-of-processing effects in the less fluent language

Memory & Cognition : Volume 40, Issue 2, February 2012

Memory & Cognition : Volume 40, Issue 1, January 2012

Memory & Cognition : Volume 39

Memory & Cognition : Volume 38

Memory & Cognition : Volume 37

Memory & Cognition : Volume 36

Memory & Cognition : Volume 35

Memory & Cognition : Volume 34

Memory & Cognition : Volume 33

Memory & Cognition : Volume 32

Memory & Cognition : Volume 31

Memory & Cognition : Volume 30

Memory & Cognition : Volume 29

Memory & Cognition : Volume 28

Memory & Cognition : Volume 27

Memory & Cognition : Volume 26

Memory & Cognition : Volume 25

Differences in the strength of distractor inhibition do not affect distractor–response bindings

Content Provider	Springer Nature Link
Author	Giesen, Carina Frings, Christian Rothermund, Klaus
Copyright Year	2011
Abstract	Distractor inhibition and distractor–response binding were investigated in two experiments by analyzing distractor repetition benefits and their interaction with response repetition effects in a sequential-priming paradigm. Distractor repetition benefits were larger for distractors that were incompatible with the to-be-executed response (task-related distractors) than for distractors that were not assigned to a response (neutral distractors), indicating that the strength of distractor inhibition was a function of response interference for the distractors. In contrast, the distractor–response bindings were found to be of equal strength for both task-related and neutral distractors. Thus, differences in the strengths of distractor inhibition did not affect the integration of distractors with responses into event files. Instead, our results suggest that distractor–response binding and distractor inhibition are independent mechanisms that are recruited for the automatization of behavior and action control.
Starting Page	373
Ending Page	387
Page Count	15
File Format	PDF
ISSN	0090502X
Journal	Memory & Cognition
Volume Number	40
Issue Number	3
e-ISSN	15325946
Language	English
Publisher	Springer-Verlag
Publisher Date	2011-11-12
Publisher Place	New York
Access Restriction	One Nation One Subscription (ONOS)
Subject Keyword	Event files Inhibition Stimulus–response binding Repetition priming Episodic retrieval Selective attention Cognitive Psychology
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Article
Subject	Experimental and Cognitive Psychology Arts and Humanities Medicine Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

Differences in the strength of distractor inhibition do not affect distractor–response bindings

Repetition priming in visual search: Episodic retrieval, not feature priming

Repetition priming in visual search: Episodic retrieval, not feature priming

Retrieval of event files can be conceptually mediated

Stimulus–response bindings code both abstract and specific representations of stimuli: evidence from a classification priming design that reverses multiple levels of response representation

Where memory meets attention: neural substrates of negative priming

The Influence of Cognitive Load on Distractor-Response Bindings

Reluctance against the machine: Retrieval of observational stimulus-response episodes in online settings emerges when interacting with a human, but not with a computer partner.

Stimulus–response bindings code both abstract and specific representations of stimuli: evidence from a classification priming design that reverses multiple levels of response representation

Differences in the strength of distractor inhibition do not affect distractor–response bindings

Similar Documents

Differences in the strength of distractor inhibition do not affect distractor–response bindings

Repetition priming in visual search: Episodic retrieval, not feature priming

Repetition priming in visual search: Episodic retrieval, not feature priming

Retrieval of event files can be conceptually mediated

Stimulus–response bindings code both abstract and specific representations of stimuli: evidence from a classification priming design that reverses multiple levels of response representation

Where memory meets attention: neural substrates of negative priming

The Influence of Cognitive Load on Distractor-Response Bindings

Reluctance against the machine: Retrieval of observational stimulus-response episodes in online settings emerges when interacting with a human, but not with a computer partner.

Stimulus–response bindings code both abstract and specific representations of stimuli: evidence from a classification priming design that reverses multiple levels of response representation

Differences in the strength of distractor inhibition do not affect distractor–response bindings