NDLI: Optimizing multiple-choice tests as tools for learning

Content Provider	Springer Nature Link
Author	Little, Jeri L. Bjork, Elizabeth Ligon
Copyright Year	2014
Abstract	Answering multiple-choice questions with competitive alternatives can enhance performance on a later test, not only on questions about the information previously tested, but also on questions about related information not previously tested—in particular, on questions about information pertaining to the previously incorrect alternatives. In the present research, we assessed a possible explanation for this pattern: When multiple-choice questions contain competitive incorrect alternatives, test-takers are led to retrieve previously studied information pertaining to all of the alternatives in order to discriminate among them and select an answer, with such processing strengthening later access to information associated with both the correct and incorrect alternatives. Supporting this hypothesis, we found enhanced performance on a later cued-recall test for previously nontested questions when their answers had previously appeared as competitive incorrect alternatives in the initial multiple-choice test, but not when they had previously appeared as noncompetitive alternatives. Importantly, however, competitive alternatives were not more likely than noncompetitive alternatives to be intruded as incorrect responses, indicating that a general increased accessibility for previously presented incorrect alternatives could not be the explanation for these results. The present findings, replicated across two experiments (one in which corrective feedback was provided during the initial multiple-choice testing, and one in which it was not), thus strongly suggest that competitive multiple-choice questions can trigger beneficial retrieval processes for both tested and related information, and the results have implications for the effective use of multiple-choice tests as tools for learning.
Starting Page	14
Ending Page	26
Page Count	13
File Format	PDF
ISSN	0090502X
Journal	Memory & Cognition
Volume Number	43
Issue Number	1
e-ISSN	15325946
Language	English
Publisher	Springer US
Publisher Date	2014-08-15
Publisher Place	Boston
Access Restriction	One Nation One Subscription (ONOS)
Subject Keyword	Memory Educational psychology Retrieval processes Learning Multiple-choice tests Testing effects Cognitive Psychology
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Article
Subject	Experimental and Cognitive Psychology Arts and Humanities Medicine Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

Multiple-choice tests stabilize access to marginal knowledge

Multiple-choice pretesting potentiates learning of related information

Retrieval processes that produce interference in modified forced-choice recognition tests

Memorial consequences of multiple-choice testing on immediate and delayed tests

Testing effects in mixed- versus pure-list designs

Optimizing retrieval as a learning event: When and why expanding retrieval practice enhances long-term retention

Discrepancy-plus-search processes in prospective memory retrieval

Testing potentiates new learning in the misinformation paradigm

When and why do retrieval attempts enhance subsequent encoding?

Optimizing multiple-choice tests as tools for learning

Similar Documents

Multiple-choice tests stabilize access to marginal knowledge

Multiple-choice pretesting potentiates learning of related information

Retrieval processes that produce interference in modified forced-choice recognition tests

Memorial consequences of multiple-choice testing on immediate and delayed tests

Testing effects in mixed- versus pure-list designs

Optimizing retrieval as a learning event: When and why expanding retrieval practice enhances long-term retention

Discrepancy-plus-search processes in prospective memory retrieval

Testing potentiates new learning in the misinformation paradigm

When and why do retrieval attempts enhance subsequent encoding?

Optimizing multiple-choice tests as tools for learning