NDLI: Comparison of phosphite application methods for control of Phytophthora cinnamomi in threatened communities

Content Provider	Springer Nature Link
Author	Crane, C. E. Shearer, B. L.
Copyright Year	2013
Abstract	Stem injection, high and low-volume aerial spray and stem spray using Pentra-bark® and Pulse® as bark penetrants were compared to determine whether application method could increase the effectiveness of phosphite in inhibiting colonisation by Phytophthora cinnamomi. Phosphite stem injection and stem spray inhibited P. cinnamomi more effectively than aerial application. In contrast, low-volume aerial phosphite spray showed the least effectiveness. Colonisation in B. attenuata was significantly reduced by stem spray of phosphite alone at 400 g/L and phosphite at ≥200 g/L when combined with Pentra-bark® or Pulse®. For B. baxteri, colonisation of P. cinnamomi was significantly reduced by stem spray of phosphite alone at ≥200 g /L and by phosphite ≥100 g /L when combined with Pentra-bark® and phosphite at ≥200 g /L combined with Pulse®. Stem spray did not significantly control of colonisation in L. inermis var. inermis. Only stem injection overcame the ineffectiveness of phosphite application in L. inermis var. inermis previously recorded. Different responses of species to phosphite application highlights the need to assess effectiveness at the species level.
Starting Page	143
Ending Page	149
Page Count	7
File Format	PDF
ISSN	08153191
Journal	Australasian Plant Pathology
Volume Number	43
Issue Number	2
e-ISSN	14486032
Language	English
Publisher	Springer Netherlands
Publisher Date	2013-11-20
Publisher Institution	Australasian Plant Pathology Society
Publisher Place	Dordrecht
Access Restriction	One Nation One Subscription (ONOS)
Subject Keyword	Biodiversity protection Integrated adaptive management Phosphite Phosphonate Stem injection Low and high-volume foliar spray Stem spray Phytophthora cinnamomi Plant Pathology Plant Sciences Agriculture Entomology Ecology
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Article
Subject	Plant Science

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

Variation between plant species of in-planta concentration and effectiveness of low-volume phosphite spray on Phytophthora cinnamomi lesion development

Variation within the genus Lambertia in efficacy of low-volume aerial phosphite spray for control of Phytophthora cinnamomi

Application of phosphite in a high-volume foliar spray delays and reduces the rate of mortality of four Banksia species infected with Phytophthora cinnamomi

Influence of site and rate of low-volume aerial phosphite spray on lesion development of Phytophthora cinnamomi and phosphite persistence in Lambertia inermis var. inermis and Banksia grandis

A stem injection of phosphite protects Banksia species and Eucalyptus marginata from Phytophthora cinnamomi for at least four years

Calcium sulphate soil treatments augment the survival of phosphite-sprayed Banksia leptophylla infected with Phytophthora cinnamomi

Novel phosphite and nutrient application to control Phytophthora cinnamomi disease

Phosphonate applied as a pre-plant dip controls Phytophthora cinnamomi root and heart rot in susceptible pineapple hybrids

Phosphite induces expression of a putative proteophosphoglycan gene in Phytophthora cinnamomi

Comparison of phosphite application methods for control of Phytophthora cinnamomi in threatened communities

Similar Documents

Variation between plant species of in-planta concentration and effectiveness of low-volume phosphite spray on Phytophthora cinnamomi lesion development

Variation within the genus Lambertia in efficacy of low-volume aerial phosphite spray for control of Phytophthora cinnamomi

Application of phosphite in a high-volume foliar spray delays and reduces the rate of mortality of four Banksia species infected with Phytophthora cinnamomi

Influence of site and rate of low-volume aerial phosphite spray on lesion development of Phytophthora cinnamomi and phosphite persistence in Lambertia inermis var. inermis and Banksia grandis

A stem injection of phosphite protects Banksia species and Eucalyptus marginata from Phytophthora cinnamomi for at least four years

Calcium sulphate soil treatments augment the survival of phosphite-sprayed Banksia leptophylla infected with Phytophthora cinnamomi

Novel phosphite and nutrient application to control Phytophthora cinnamomi disease

Phosphonate applied as a pre-plant dip controls Phytophthora cinnamomi root and heart rot in susceptible pineapple hybrids

Phosphite induces expression of a putative proteophosphoglycan gene in Phytophthora cinnamomi

Comparison of phosphite application methods for control of Phytophthora cinnamomi in threatened communities