NDLI: Can’t We All Disagree More Constructively? Moral Foundations, Moral Reasoning, and Political Disagreement

Please wait, while we are loading the content...

Can’t We All Disagree More Constructively? Moral Foundations, Moral Reasoning, and Political Disagreement

Content Provider	Springer Nature Link
Author	Sauer, Han
Copyright Year	2015
Abstract	Can’t we all disagree more constructively? Recent years have seen a dramatic increase in political partisanship: the 2013 shutdown of the US government as well as an ever more divided political landscape in Europe illustrate that citizens and representatives of developed nations fundamentally disagree over virtually every significant issue of public policy, from immigration to health care, from the regulation of financial markets to climate change, from drug policies to medical procedures (Koleva et al. Journal of Research in Personality 46:184–194, 2012). The emerging field of political psychology brings the tools of moral psychology to bear on this issue. It suggests that the main conflict shaping politics today can be explained in terms of people’s moral foundations (Graham et al. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 96(5):1029–1046, 2009; Haidt 2012; Graham et al. PLOS One 7(12):1–13, (2012); cf. also Rai and Fiske Psychological Review 118:57–75, 2011): progressive liberals, it is argued, view society as consisting of separate individuals with differing values and life plans, whereas conservatives rely on a thicker notion of political morality that includes traditions, communities, and values of purity (Haidt and Graham Social Justice Research 20:98–116, 2007). In this paper, I explore the normative implications of this theory. In particular, I will argue that its proponents take it to support an asymmetry of understanding: if deep political disagreements reflect differences in people’s moral foundations, and these disagreements cannot be rationally resolved, then overcoming them makes it necessary to acknowledge the moral foundations of the other side’s political outlook. But conservatives, the theory suggests, already do acknowledge all of the liberal moral foundations, and not vice versa. To overcome partisanship and the resulting political deadlock, then, it seems to be up to liberals to move closer towards the conservative side, and not vice versa. I wish to analyze what the argument for this asymmetry is and whether it holds up. In the end, I shall argue that the available evidence does support an asymmetry, but that it is the opposite of what Moral Foundations theorists think it is. There is such an asymmetry - but its burden falls on the conservative side.
Starting Page	153
Ending Page	169
Page Count	17
File Format	PDF
ISSN	18745490
Journal	Neuroethics
Volume Number	8
Issue Number	2
e-ISSN	18745504
Language	English
Publisher	Springer Netherlands
Publisher Date	2015-05-16
Publisher Place	Dordrecht
Access Restriction	One Nation One Subscription (ONOS)
Subject Keyword	Moral cognition Moral foundations Political disagreement Ethics Neurology Neurobiology Neurosurgery Neuropsychology Neuroradiology
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Article
Subject	Philosophy Neurology Health Policy Psychiatry and Mental Health

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

Autonomy and Enhancement

More Experiments in Ethics

Cognitive Neuroscience and Moral Decision-making: Guide or Set Aside?

Moral Enhancement and Self-Subversion Objections

Is Deontology a Moral Confabulation?

Moral Bioenhancement, Freedom and Reason

Enhancing Moral Conformity and Enhancing Moral Worth

Introducing Neuroethics

On Defining Moral Enhancement: A Clarificatory Taxonomy

Can’t We All Disagree More Constructively? Moral Foundations, Moral Reasoning, and Political Disagreement

Similar Documents

Autonomy and Enhancement

More Experiments in Ethics

Cognitive Neuroscience and Moral Decision-making: Guide or Set Aside?

Moral Enhancement and Self-Subversion Objections

Is Deontology a Moral Confabulation?

Moral Bioenhancement, Freedom and Reason

Enhancing Moral Conformity and Enhancing Moral Worth

Introducing Neuroethics

On Defining Moral Enhancement: A Clarificatory Taxonomy

Can’t We All Disagree More Constructively? Moral Foundations, Moral Reasoning, and Political Disagreement