NDLI: Notices and Policies for Retractions, Expressions of Concern, Errata and Corrigenda: Their Importance, Content, and Context

Content Provider	Springer Nature Link
Author	Teixeira da Silva, Jaime A. Dobránszki, Judit
Copyright Year	2016
Abstract	A retraction notice is an essential scientific historical document because it should outline the reason(s) why a scientific manuscript was retracted, culpability (if any) and any other factors that have given reason for the authors, editors, or publisher, to remove a piece of the literature from science’s history books. Unlike an expression of concern (EoC), erratum or corrigendum, a retraction will usually result in a rudimentary vestige of the work. Thus, any retraction notice that does not fully indicate a set of elements related to the reason and background for the retraction serves as a poor historical document. Moreover, poorly or incompletely worded retraction notices in fact do not serve their intended purpose, i.e., to hold all parties accountable, and to inform the scientific and wider public of the problem and reason for the paper’s demise. This paper takes a look at the definitions and the policies of clauses for retractions, EoCs, errata and corrigenda in place by 15 leading science, technology and medicine (STM) publishers and four publishing-related bodies that we believe have the greatest influence on the current fields of science, technology and medicine. The primary purpose was to assess whether there is a consistency among these entities and publishers. Using an arbitrary 5-scale classification system, and evaluating the different categories of policies separately, we discovered that in almost all cases (88.9 %), the wording used to define these four categories of polices differs from that of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), which is generally considered to be the guiding set of definitions in science publishing. In addition, as much as 61 % deviation in policies (wording and meaning), relative to COPE guidelines, was discovered. When considering the average pooled deviation across all categories of policies, we discovered that there was either no deviation or a small deviation, only in the wording, in the definition of policies when compared to the COPE guidelines in 1 out of 3 ethical bodies, and in 40 % (6 out of 15) STM publishers. Moderate deviation from the COPE guidelines was detected in 26.7 % of STM publishers and one ethical body but a large deviation in one ethical body and 20 % of STM publishers was observed. Two STM publishers (13.3 %) did not report any information about these policies. Even though in practice, editors and publishers may deviate from these written definitions when dealing with case-by-case issues, we believe that it is essential, to serve as a consistent guide for authors and editors, that the wording be standardized across these entities. COPE and these entities also have the responsibility of making it clear that these definitions are merely suggestions and that their application may be subjected to subjective interpretation and application.
Starting Page	521
Ending Page	554
Page Count	34
File Format	PDF
ISSN	13533452
Journal	Science and Engineering Ethics
Volume Number	23
Issue Number	2
e-ISSN	14715546
Language	English
Publisher	Springer Netherlands
Publisher Date	2016-05-18
Publisher Place	Dordrecht
Access Restriction	Subscribed
Subject Keyword	Accountability COPE Correction Errors Ethics Free Literature correction Retraction STM publishers Philosophy of Science Engineering Biomedical Engineering Medicine/Public Health Philosophy
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Article
Subject	Issues, Ethics and Legal Aspects Health (social science) Management of Technology and Innovation Health Policy

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

The (lack of) Impact of Retraction on Citation Networks

Plagiarism Allegations Account for Most Retractions in Major Latin American/Caribbean Databases

Correction and use of biomedical literature affected by scientific misconduct

Implementing ethics in the professions: Examples from environmental epidemiology

Exploring Why and How Journal Editors Retract Articles: Findings From a Qualitative Study

The Importance of Defining ‘Data’ in Data Management Policies : Commentary on: “Issues in Data Management”

Online-Based Approaches to Identify Real Journals and Publishers from Hijacked Ones

The mining engineer, moral luck, and professional accountability

Authors and publication practices

Notices and Policies for Retractions, Expressions of Concern, Errata and Corrigenda: Their Importance, Content, and Context

Similar Documents

The (lack of) Impact of Retraction on Citation Networks

Plagiarism Allegations Account for Most Retractions in Major Latin American/Caribbean Databases

Correction and use of biomedical literature affected by scientific misconduct

Implementing ethics in the professions: Examples from environmental epidemiology

Exploring Why and How Journal Editors Retract Articles: Findings From a Qualitative Study

The Importance of Defining ‘Data’ in Data Management Policies : Commentary on: “Issues in Data Management”

Online-Based Approaches to Identify Real Journals and Publishers from Hijacked Ones

The mining engineer, moral luck, and professional accountability

Authors and publication practices

Notices and Policies for Retractions, Expressions of Concern, Errata and Corrigenda: Their Importance, Content, and Context