NDLI: Sub-Optimal Justification and Justificatory Defenses

Please wait, while we are loading the content...

Sub-Optimal Justification and Justificatory Defenses

Content Provider	Springer Nature Link
Author	Segev, Re’em
Copyright Year	2009
Abstract	Justificatory defenses apply to actions that are generally wrong and illegal—mainly since they harm people—when they are (exceptionally) justified—usually since they prevent (more serious) harm to others. A strict conception of justification limits justificatory defenses to actions that reflect all pertinent principles in the optimal manner. A more relaxed conception of justification applies (also) to actions that do not reflect all pertinent principles optimally due to (unjustified) mistake but are not too far from this optimum. In the paper, I consider whether justificatory defenses should reflect the strict conception of justification or a more relaxed conception of justification. This question is important since often the relevant actions are not strictly justified, while the alternative of an excuse is frequently irrelevant or does not provide an appropriate solution. Reflection on this question raises the following dilemma: On the one hand, the strict interpretation seems too harsh, especially with regard to legal (particularly criminal) liability. On the other hand, it is difficult to explain the basis for a more relaxed conception of justification. I conclude, first, that justification—and accordingly wrongfulness—is a matter of degree and that the strictly justified action is merely the peak of a continuum, and, second, that a practical (negative) reaction is in place only with regard to actions whose wrongness is above a minimal threshold.
Starting Page	57
Ending Page	76
Page Count	20
File Format	PDF
ISSN	18719791
Journal	Criminal Law and Philosophy
Volume Number	4
Issue Number	1
e-ISSN	18719805
Language	English
Publisher	Springer Netherlands
Publisher Date	2009-09-30
Publisher Place	Dordrecht
Access Restriction	One Nation One Subscription (ONOS)
Subject Keyword	Justification Optimal (strict) justification Sub-optimal justification Justificatory defense Uncertainty Mistake Excuse Philosophy Ethics Criminal Law Philosophy of Law Law Theory/Law Philosophy
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Article
Subject	Philosophy Law

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

Responsibility and Justificatory Defenses

On Necessity as a Defence to Crime: Possibilities, Problems and the Limits of Justification and Excuse

The Costs to Criminal Theory of Supposing that Intentions are Irrelevant to Permissibility

Violating Strict Deontological Constraints: Excuse or Pardon?

Should the Law Convict Those Who Act from Conviction? Reflections on a Demands-of-Conscience Criminal Defense

Excuses, excuses

Mistake of Fact or Mistake of Criminal Law? Explaining and Defending the Distinction

Mistake of Law and Culpability

Excuses in law and in morality: a response to Marcia Baron

Sub-Optimal Justification and Justificatory Defenses

Similar Documents

Responsibility and Justificatory Defenses

On Necessity as a Defence to Crime: Possibilities, Problems and the Limits of Justification and Excuse

The Costs to Criminal Theory of Supposing that Intentions are Irrelevant to Permissibility

Violating Strict Deontological Constraints: Excuse or Pardon?

Should the Law Convict Those Who Act from Conviction? Reflections on a Demands-of-Conscience Criminal Defense

Excuses, excuses

Mistake of Fact or Mistake of Criminal Law? Explaining and Defending the Distinction

Mistake of Law and Culpability

Excuses in law and in morality: a response to Marcia Baron

Sub-Optimal Justification and Justificatory Defenses