NDLI: Measuring strategy use in context with multiple-choice items

Content Provider	Springer Nature Link
Author	Cromley, Jennifer Azevedo, Roger
Copyright Year	2011
Abstract	A number of authors have presented data that challenge the validity of self-report of strategy use or choice of strategy. We created a multiple-choice measure of students’ strategy use based on the work of Kozminsky, E., and Kozminsky, L. (2001), and tested it with three samples as part of a series of studies testing the fit of the DIME model of reading comprehension. One study was conducted at the high school level (N = 175) and two at the undergraduate level (N = 185 and 737). Over the three studies with three different samples, we found good evidence for the internal consistency reliability and concurrent validity of this type of measure. Commonality analysis suggested that strategy use mainly makes a shared contribution to comprehension with other predictors, especially inference, and to some extent vocabulary, background knowledge, and word reading. The measure was relatively easy to construct and easy to administer to large numbers of students, and showed much higher evidence of concurrent validity than self-ratings of frequency of use of strategies.
Starting Page	155
Ending Page	177
Page Count	23
File Format	PDF
ISSN	15561623
Journal	Metacognition and Learning
Volume Number	6
Issue Number	2
e-ISSN	15561631
Language	English
Publisher	Springer US
Publisher Date	2011-02-17
Publisher Place	Boston
Access Restriction	One Nation One Subscription (ONOS)
Subject Keyword	Strategy use Comprehension Validity Reliability Measurement Education (general) Teaching and Teacher Education Learning & Instruction
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Article
Subject	Education

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

Measuring deep, reflective comprehension and learning strategies: challenges and successes

Measuring strategic processing when students read multiple texts

Measuring strategy use with self-report instruments: theoretical and empirical considerations

Assessing comprehension during reading with the Reading Strategy Assessment Tool (RSAT)

Improving students’ science text comprehension through metacognitive self-regulation when applying learning strategies

Self-report of reading comprehension strategies: What are we measuring?

Alternative assessment of strategy use with self-report instruments: a discussion

Fostering multiple text comprehension: How metacognitive strategies and motivation moderate the text-belief consistency effect

Measuring strategic processing: comparing task-specific self-reports to traces

Measuring strategy use in context with multiple-choice items

Similar Documents

Measuring deep, reflective comprehension and learning strategies: challenges and successes

Measuring strategic processing when students read multiple texts

Measuring strategy use with self-report instruments: theoretical and empirical considerations

Assessing comprehension during reading with the Reading Strategy Assessment Tool (RSAT)

Improving students’ science text comprehension through metacognitive self-regulation when applying learning strategies

Self-report of reading comprehension strategies: What are we measuring?

Alternative assessment of strategy use with self-report instruments: a discussion

Fostering multiple text comprehension: How metacognitive strategies and motivation moderate the text-belief consistency effect

Measuring strategic processing: comparing task-specific self-reports to traces

Measuring strategy use in context with multiple-choice items