NDLI: Between full LCA and energy certification methodology—a comparison of six methodological variants of buildings environmental assessment

Content Provider	Springer Nature Link
Author	Lewandowska, Anna skowiak, Andrzej Pajchrowski, Grzegorz Zarebska, Joanna
Copyright Year	2014
Abstract	Construction, as a sector of the economy, is a significant source of negative environmental impacts. The development of sustainable construction and associated initiatives are meant to reduce that impact. Buildings, for many reasons, are the complex objects of life cycle assessment (LCA) studies, which in this case can be particularly time-, data- and cost-consuming. Therefore, an attempt was made to explore the possibility of finding a methodological compromise between a full LCA and the compulsory energy certification. Six methodological variants, so called compromise solutions (CS) were identified and assessed. This article presents the results of the research project financed by the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education (N N309 078138) and coordinated by the Wood Technology Institute in Poznan.The proposed CS were hybrids utilising, to various degrees, the environmental life cycle assessment (LCA) and energy certification. Life cycle impact assessments were carried out using IMPACT 2002+.The achieved results showed that the simplifications included in the energy certification lead to a significant drop in environmental impacts (by 77.9 % on average) in relation to the impact calculated for the full LCA. The results closest to the full LCA were achieved by the compromise solution no. 4 (CS4), where simplification included the exclusion from the life cycle of: transport processes, construction site, demolition, final disposal of waste, and the majority of elements associated with the use of the building. CS4 analysed all inventory inputs which were assessed with regard to the entire environmental profile. The following truncation levels were achieved for CS4—10.7 % (conventional masonry building), 9.9 % (passive masonry building), 8.3 % (conventional wooden building) and 7.4 % (passive wooden building), indicating that 90 % of the impact calculated for the full LCA was retained.CS4 seems to be a rational compromise between the simplicity of the methodology and the environmental significance. With the exception of the energy usage for heating, hot water and ventilation, CS4 also proposes including, in the analysis, the production of building material and additional elements associated with the use stage, e.g. energy usage for home appliances and lighting, land occupation, water use and wastewater treatment. However, if we were to find a rational minimum, which is close to the energy certification, then a good improvement of this methodology would be to include energy usage for home appliances and lighting as well as introducing conversion indicators, based not only on the depletion of energy resources, but also factoring in global warming and respiratory effects/inorganic compounds. Moreover, it seems that the LCA methodology and, specifically, characterisation factors, are refined to such a degree and scientifically proved that it would be possible to use the knowledge with regard to LCA to establish such indicators for energy certification.
Starting Page	9
Ending Page	22
Page Count	14
File Format	PDF
ISSN	09483349
Journal	The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Volume Number	20
Issue Number	1
e-ISSN	16147502
Language	English
Publisher	Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Publisher Date	2014-11-04
Publisher Place	Berlin, Heidelberg
Access Restriction	One Nation One Subscription (ONOS)
Subject Keyword	Buildings Energy certification Environmental impact Life cycle Simplifications Environment Environmental Economics Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology Environmental Chemistry
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Article
Subject	Environmental Science

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

Between full LCA and energy certification methodology—a comparison of six methodological variants of buildings environmental assessment

Assessing resource depletion in LCA: a review of methods and methodological issues

Development of a methodological framework for social life-cycle assessment of novel technologies

A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment : Part 2: impact assessment and interpretation

Life cycle assessment of hydrogen energy systems: a review of methodological choices

Cumulative energy demand in LCA: the energy harvested approach

Comparison of different normalised LCIA results and their feasibility in communication

The life cycle assessment of a UK data centre

Life cycle assessment in green chemistry: overview of key parameters and methodological concerns

Between full LCA and energy certification methodology—a comparison of six methodological variants of buildings environmental assessment

Similar Documents

Between full LCA and energy certification methodology—a comparison of six methodological variants of buildings environmental assessment

Assessing resource depletion in LCA: a review of methods and methodological issues

Development of a methodological framework for social life-cycle assessment of novel technologies

A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment : Part 2: impact assessment and interpretation

Life cycle assessment of hydrogen energy systems: a review of methodological choices

Cumulative energy demand in LCA: the energy harvested approach

Comparison of different normalised LCIA results and their feasibility in communication

The life cycle assessment of a UK data centre

Life cycle assessment in green chemistry: overview of key parameters and methodological concerns

Between full LCA and energy certification methodology—a comparison of six methodological variants of buildings environmental assessment