NDLI: Impact of normalisation, elicitation technique and background information on panel weighting results in life cycle assessment

Content Provider	Springer Nature Link
Author	Myllyviita, Tanja Leskinen, Pekka Seppälä, Jyri
Copyright Year	2013
Abstract	Weighting in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a much-debated topic. Various tools have been used for weighting in LCA, Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) being one of the most common. However, it has not been thoroughly assessed how weight elicitation techniques of MCDA with different scales (interval and ratio) along with external and internal normalisation affect weighting and subsequent results. The aim of this survey is to compare different techniques in an illustrative example in the building sector.A panel of Nordic LCA experts accomplished six weighting exercises. The different weight elicitation techniques are SWING which is based on the interval scale; Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique (SMART) and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) which is based on the ratio scale. Information on the case study was provided for the panellists, along with characterised or normalised impact assessment scores. However, in the first weighting exercise, the panellists were not provided with any scores or background information, but they had to complete the weighting at a more general level. With the weights provided by the panel, the environmental impacts of three alternative house types were aggregated. The calculations were based on three well-grounded aggregation rules, which are commonly used in the field of LCA or decision analysis.In the illustrative construction example, the different aggregation rules had the biggest impact on the results. The results were different in the six calculation methods: when externally normalised scores were applied, house type A was superior in most of the calculations, but when internal normalisation was accomplished, house type C was superior. By using equal weights, similar results were obtained. None of the panellists intuitively considered A as the superior house type, but in some of the calculations, this was indeed the case. Furthermore, the results refer to the fact that the panellists completed the weighting on the basis of their general knowledge, without taking the features of different weight elicitation techniques into account.External normalisation provides information on a magnitude of impacts, and in some cases, external normalisation may be a more influential factor than weighting. Based on the results, it cannot be stated which different weight elicitation technique is the most suitable for LCA. However, the method should be selected based on the aims and purpose of the study. Moreover, the elicitation questions should be explained with care to experts so that they interpret the questions as intended.
Starting Page	377
Ending Page	386
Page Count	10
File Format	PDF
ISSN	09483349
Journal	The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Volume Number	19
Issue Number	2
e-ISSN	16147502
Language	English
Publisher	Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Publisher Date	2013-08-27
Publisher Place	Berlin, Heidelberg
Access Restriction	One Nation One Subscription (ONOS)
Subject Keyword	Interval scale Life cycle assessment Multi-criteria decision analysis Normalisation Ratio scale Weighting Environment Environmental Economics Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology Environmental Chemistry
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Article
Subject	Environmental Science

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

Normalisation and weighting in life cycle assessment: quo vadis?

Life cycle assessment capacity roadmap (section 1): decision-making support using LCA

On the meaning of the distance-to-target weighting method and normalisation in Life Cycle Impact assessment

Towards life cycle sustainability assessment: drawing on the NEEDS project’s total cost and multi-criteria decision analysis ranking methods

Relationships between weighting factors and normalisation in Life Cycle Impact assessment

A decision-analytic framework for impact assessment part I: LCA and decision analysis

Comparison of different normalised LCIA results and their feasibility in communication

Life cycle impact assessment sophistication : International workshop

Review of criteria for evaluating LCA weighting methods

Impact of normalisation, elicitation technique and background information on panel weighting results in life cycle assessment

Similar Documents

Normalisation and weighting in life cycle assessment: quo vadis?

Life cycle assessment capacity roadmap (section 1): decision-making support using LCA

On the meaning of the distance-to-target weighting method and normalisation in Life Cycle Impact assessment

Towards life cycle sustainability assessment: drawing on the NEEDS project’s total cost and multi-criteria decision analysis ranking methods

Relationships between weighting factors and normalisation in Life Cycle Impact assessment

A decision-analytic framework for impact assessment part I: LCA and decision analysis

Comparison of different normalised LCIA results and their feasibility in communication

Life cycle impact assessment sophistication : International workshop

Review of criteria for evaluating LCA weighting methods

Impact of normalisation, elicitation technique and background information on panel weighting results in life cycle assessment