NDLI: Dynamic greenhouse gas accounting for cellulosic biofuels: implications of time based methodology decisions

Content Provider	Springer Nature Link
Author	Daystar, Jesse Venditti, Richard Kelley, Stephen S.
Copyright Year	2016
Abstract	Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions resulting from biofuel production and use often occur over many different years. Nondynamic GHG accounting methods traditionally sum the global warming impacts (GWIs) occurring over a 100-year period for all emissions occurring in the life cycle regardless of emission timing. When examining biofuels from a policy perspective, time horizons are chosen to determine the benefits a policy or action has over a desired time period. It is critical to only account for impacts occurring within the given time period by having consistent temporal boundaries. When calculating the GWI as a function of time, additional assumptions and data are required. These assumptions have implications on the results and are explored herein to determine their influence on the overall conclusions when comparing biofuels made from different cellulosic feedstocks.The time zero assumption of both biomass planting and harvesting was examined. Analytical time horizon choice was also tested by examining results on a 25-, 50-, 100-, and 500-year time horizon. GWIs using dynamic GHG accounting methods were compared to nondynamic GWI method results. Direct land use change (LUC) emissions were determined for the different feedstock conversion scenarios and used to calculate a payback period for switchgrass and sweet sorghum biofuel scenarios. Dynamic biofuel life cycle emissions were also modeled for biofuel scenarios where LUC emissions were negative in the case of converting cropland to forests.Biofuel life cycle emissions and GHG reductions compared to gasoline were highly sensitive to GHG accounting methods and time horizons. The time zero assumption had greater influence on the results when shorter time horizons were chosen and decreased as time horizons approached 500 years. Using the dynamic GHG accounting method, LUC payback periods were determined to be greater compared to a 0 % emission discount method. Payback periods using a discount rate of 2 and 3 % were at times greater and less than dynamic GHG accounting method results.The data presented herein suggest that time zero and other temporal emission timing assumptions are important and influence the overall study results. Analytical time horizons were also shown to be important and significantly influence the overall results, as well as be important to achieving carbon mitigation goals. Dynamic GHG accounting was shown to be a more robust method than the traditional static GWI accounting method ensuring consistent temporal boundaries; however, dynamic inventories require additional emission timing details and assumptions that require more effort and resources to model.
Starting Page	812
Ending Page	826
Page Count	15
File Format	PDF
ISSN	09483349
Journal	The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Volume Number	22
Issue Number	5
e-ISSN	16147502
Language	English
Publisher	Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Publisher Date	2016-11-10
Publisher Place	Berlin, Heidelberg
Access Restriction	One Nation One Subscription (ONOS)
Subject Keyword	Biofuel Biogenic carbon Dynamic LCA Emission timing Forest carbon Greenhouse gas Temporary carbon storage Environment Environmental Economics Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology Environmental Chemistry
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Article
Subject	Environmental Science

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

A greenhouse gas indicator for bioenergy: some theoretical issues with practical implications

Marginal yield, technological advances, and emissions timing in corn ethanol’s carbon payback time

Cost and Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Implications of Integrating Biogas Upgrading and Carbon Capture Technologies in Cellulosic Biorefineries

Time-adjusted global warming potentials for LCA and carbon footprints

A greenhouse gas indicator for bioenergy: some theoretical issues with practical implications

The contribution of PAS 2050 to the evolution of international greenhouse gas emission standards

Greenhouse gas emissions from forestry in East Norway

Stable forest carbon stocks support current assumption of biogenic carbon neutrality in the case of European-manufactured beverage cartons

The potential contribution to climate change mitigation from temporary carbon storage in biomaterials

Dynamic greenhouse gas accounting for cellulosic biofuels: implications of time based methodology decisions

Similar Documents

A greenhouse gas indicator for bioenergy: some theoretical issues with practical implications

Marginal yield, technological advances, and emissions timing in corn ethanol’s carbon payback time

Cost and Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Implications of Integrating Biogas Upgrading and Carbon Capture Technologies in Cellulosic Biorefineries

Time-adjusted global warming potentials for LCA and carbon footprints

A greenhouse gas indicator for bioenergy: some theoretical issues with practical implications

The contribution of PAS 2050 to the evolution of international greenhouse gas emission standards

Greenhouse gas emissions from forestry in East Norway

Stable forest carbon stocks support current assumption of biogenic carbon neutrality in the case of European-manufactured beverage cartons

The potential contribution to climate change mitigation from temporary carbon storage in biomaterials

Dynamic greenhouse gas accounting for cellulosic biofuels: implications of time based methodology decisions