NDLI: Verballed? Incommensurability 50 years on

Content Provider	Springer Nature Link
Author	D’Agosti, Fred
Copyright Year	2013
Abstract	Someone is “verballed” in the Anglo-Australian idiom if they have attributed to them statements they did not actually make and indeed have explicitly denied. We will examine the evidence that Kuhn and Feyerabend were verballed in this sense by their critics and that the role of the idea of incommensurability in their argumentation has been systematically misunderstood and -represented. In particular, we will see that neither Kuhn nor Feyerabend, despite what their critics often say about them, held that incommensurability of theories implies the rational incomparability of theories. This is especially clear in the case of Feyerabend, whose argument is NOT that theories in a scientific tradition are on occasion incommensurable, but, rather, that, when the relations of theories in a tradition are represented in a particular way, they may on occasion be incommensurable according to that representation and hence incomparable if that representation is taken as providing the mechanisms of comparison. And the point of this claim is not to establish something about science, but, rather, to establish something about the representations of science which yield this result (i.e. that two theories might be incommensurable). Feyerabend in other words invokes incommensurability (according to the standards of a particular representation) as a reductio of that mode of representation. And this argument in fact depends precisely on the comparability of theories which are, according to the representation, incommensurable. Feyerabend’s argument is about the ways in which we should understand progress in science and he is concerned, in particular, to establish that a historically informed approach is superior to an approach which, if applicable, is applicable only to what he calls “abstract traditions”. Kuhn’s work, especially in the Postscript—1969, provides complementary materials, especially in relation to a collectivised and non-“algorithmic” account of theory choice across formally incommensurable paradigms.
Starting Page	517
Ending Page	538
Page Count	22
File Format	PDF
ISSN	00397857
Journal	Synthese
Volume Number	191
Issue Number	3
e-ISSN	15730964
Language	English
Publisher	Springer Netherlands
Publisher Date	2013-05-01
Publisher Place	Dordrecht
Access Restriction	One Nation One Subscription (ONOS)
Subject Keyword	Incommensurability Kuhn Feyerabend Shapere Philosophy of Science Epistemology Logic Philosophy of Language Metaphysics
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Article
Subject	Philosophy Social Sciences

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

Kuhn’s notion of scientific progress: “Reduction” between incommensurable theories in a rigid structuralist framework

On the role of simplicity in science

A Rosa multiflora by Any Other Name: Taxonomic Incommensurability and Scientific Kinds

Reference and Incommensurability: What Rigid Designation Won’t Get You

Arrow’s theorem and theory choice

Projective Explanation: How Theories Explain Empirical Data in Spite of Theory-Data Incommensurability

Naturalizing the essential tension

Kuhnian Revolutions Revisited

Stances and paradigms: a reflection

Verballed? Incommensurability 50 years on

Similar Documents

Kuhn’s notion of scientific progress: “Reduction” between incommensurable theories in a rigid structuralist framework

On the role of simplicity in science

A Rosa multiflora by Any Other Name: Taxonomic Incommensurability and Scientific Kinds

Reference and Incommensurability: What Rigid Designation Won’t Get You

Arrow’s theorem and theory choice

Projective Explanation: How Theories Explain Empirical Data in Spite of Theory-Data Incommensurability

Naturalizing the essential tension

Kuhnian Revolutions Revisited

Stances and paradigms: a reflection

Verballed? Incommensurability 50 years on