NDLI: On Hochberg et al.’s “The tragedy of the reviewer commons”

Content Provider	Springer Nature Link
Author	Mesnard, Louis
Copyright Year	2009
Abstract	We discuss each of the recommendations made by Hochberg et al. (Ecol Lett 12:2–4, 2009) to prevent the “tragedy of the reviewer commons”. Having scientific journals share a common database of reviewers would be to recreate a bureaucratic organization, where extra-scientific considerations prevailed. Pre-reviewing of papers by colleagues is a widespread practice but raises problems of coordination. Revising manuscripts in line with all reviewers’ recommendations presupposes that recommendations converge, which is acrobatic. Signing an undertaking that authors have taken into accounts all reviewers’ comments is both authoritarian and sterilizing. Sending previous comments with subsequent submissions to other journals amounts to creating a cartel and a single all-encompassing journal, which again is sterilizing. Using young scientists as reviewers is highly risky: they might prove very severe; and if they are not yet published authors themselves, the recommendation violates the principle of peer review. Asking reviewers to be more severe would only create a crisis in the publishing houses and actually increase reviewers’ workloads. The criticisms of the behavior of authors looking to publish in the best journals are unfair: it is natural for scholars to try to publish in the best journals and not to resign themselves to being second rate. Punishing lazy reviewers would only lower the quality of reports: instead, we favor the idea of paying reviewers “in kind” with, say, complimentary books or papers.
Starting Page	903
Ending Page	917
Page Count	15
File Format	PDF
ISSN	01389130
Journal	Scientometrics
Volume Number	84
Issue Number	3
e-ISSN	15882861
Language	English
Publisher	Springer Netherlands
Publisher Date	2009-12-31
Publisher Place	Dordrecht
Access Restriction	One Nation One Subscription (ONOS)
Subject Keyword	Reviewer Referee Editor Publisher Publishing Tragedy of the Commons Hochberg Interdisciplinary Studies Library Science Information Storage and Retrieval
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Article
Subject	Library and Information Sciences Computer Science Applications

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

Letter to the Editor; Comments on the paper of Shan et al.: The multivariate Waring distribution

Reply to the comments of Liu et al.

Correspondence: Letter to the Editor

Greetings from the new Editor-in-Chief

Letter to the Editor: Reply to Rousseau

Letter to the editor: On Randić’s H-sequence

Mainstream engineering publishing in Latin America: The Chilean experience

The European perspective on S&T indicators

Mathematical model of delay in the secondary literature publishing process

On Hochberg et al.’s “The tragedy of the reviewer commons”

Similar Documents

Letter to the Editor; Comments on the paper of Shan et al.: The multivariate Waring distribution

Reply to the comments of Liu et al.

Correspondence: Letter to the Editor

Greetings from the new Editor-in-Chief

Letter to the Editor: Reply to Rousseau

Letter to the editor: On Randić’s H-sequence

Mainstream engineering publishing in Latin America: The Chilean experience

The European perspective on S&T indicators

Mathematical model of delay in the secondary literature publishing process

On Hochberg et al.’s “The tragedy of the reviewer commons”