NDLI: A Comparison of the Weights-of-Evidence Method and Probabilistic Neural Networks

Please wait, while we are loading the content...

A Comparison of the Weights-of-Evidence Method and Probabilistic Neural Networks

Content Provider	Springer Nature Link
Author	Singer, Donald A. Kouda, Ryoichi
Copyright Year	1999
Abstract	The need to integrate large quantities of digital geoscience information to classify locations as mineral deposits or nondeposits has been met by the weights-of-evidence method in many situations. Widespread selection of this method may be more the result of its ease of use and interpretation rather than comparisons with alternative methods. A comparison of the weights-of-evidence method to probabilistic neural networks is performed here with data from Chisel Lake-Andeson Lake, Manitoba, Canada. Each method is designed to estimate the probability of belonging to learned classes where the estimated probabilities are used to classify the unknowns. Using these data, significantly lower classification error rates were observed for the neural network, not only when test and training data were the same (0.02 versus 23%), but also when validation data, not used in any training, were used to test the efficiency of classification (0.7 versus 17%). Despite these data containing too few deposits, these tests of this set of data demonstrate the neural network's ability at making unbiased probability estimates and lower error rates when measured by number of polygons or by the area of land misclassified. For both methods, independent validation tests are required to ensure that estimates are representative of real-world results. Results from the weights-of-evidence method demonstrate a strong bias where most errors are barren areas misclassified as deposits. The weights-of-evidence method is based on Bayes rule, which requires independent variables in order to make unbiased estimates. The chi-square test for independence indicates no significant correlations among the variables in the Chisel Lake–Andeson Lake data. However, the expected number of deposits test clearly demonstrates that these data violate the independence assumption. Other, independent simulations with three variables show that using variables with correlations of 1.0 can double the expected number of deposits as can correlations of −1.0. Studies done in the 1970s on methods that use Bayes rule show that moderate correlations among attributes seriously affect estimates and even small correlations lead to increases in misclassifications. Adverse effects have been observed with small to moderate correlations when only six to eight variables were used. Consistent evidence of upward biased probability estimates from multivariate methods founded on Bayes rule must be of considerable concern to institutions and governmental agencies where unbiased estimates are required. In addition to increasing the misclassification rate, biased probability estimates make classification into deposit and nondeposit classes an arbitrary subjective decision. The probabilistic neural network has no problem dealing with correlated variables—its performance depends strongly on having a thoroughly representative training set. Probabilistic neural networks or logistic regression should receive serious consideration where unbiased estimates are required. The weights-of-evidence method would serve to estimate thresholds between anomalies and background and for exploratory data analysis.
Starting Page	287
Ending Page	298
Page Count	12
File Format	PDF
ISSN	15207439
Journal	Natural Resources Research
Volume Number	8
Issue Number	4
e-ISSN	15738981
Language	English
Publisher	Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
Publisher Date	1999-01-01
Publisher Place	New York
Access Restriction	One Nation One Subscription (ONOS)
Subject Keyword	Economic Geology Hydrogeology Math. Applications in Geosciences Sedimentology
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Article
Subject	Environmental Science

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

A Comparative Analysis of Favorability Mappings by Weights of Evidence, Probabilistic Neural Networks, Discriminant Analysis, and Logistic Regression

Mineral-Potential Mapping: A Comparison of Weights-of-Evidence and Fuzzy Methods

Fuzzy Weights of Evidence Method and Its Application in Mineral Potential Mapping

Conditional Independence Test for Weights-of-Evidence Modeling

A Hybrid Fuzzy Weights-of-Evidence Model for Mineral Potential Mapping

Mineral Favorability Mapping: A Comparison of Artificial Neural Networks, Logistic Regression, and Discriminant Analysis

Landslide Representation Strategies in Susceptibility Studies using Weights-of-Evidence Modeling Technique

Application of Weights of Evidence Method for Assessment of Flowing Wells in the Greater Toronto Area, Canada

Use of a Probabilistic Neural Network to Reduce Costs of Selecting Construction Rock

A Comparison of the Weights-of-Evidence Method and Probabilistic Neural Networks

Similar Documents

A Comparative Analysis of Favorability Mappings by Weights of Evidence, Probabilistic Neural Networks, Discriminant Analysis, and Logistic Regression

Mineral-Potential Mapping: A Comparison of Weights-of-Evidence and Fuzzy Methods

Fuzzy Weights of Evidence Method and Its Application in Mineral Potential Mapping

Conditional Independence Test for Weights-of-Evidence Modeling

A Hybrid Fuzzy Weights-of-Evidence Model for Mineral Potential Mapping

Mineral Favorability Mapping: A Comparison of Artificial Neural Networks, Logistic Regression, and Discriminant Analysis

Landslide Representation Strategies in Susceptibility Studies using Weights-of-Evidence Modeling Technique

Application of Weights of Evidence Method for Assessment of Flowing Wells in the Greater Toronto Area, Canada

Use of a Probabilistic Neural Network to Reduce Costs of Selecting Construction Rock

A Comparison of the Weights-of-Evidence Method and Probabilistic Neural Networks