NDLI: Is Justice the Same for Everyone? Examining Fairness Items Using Multiple-group Analysis

Content Provider	Springer Nature Link
Author	Byrne, Zinta S. Miller, Brian K.
Copyright Year	2009
Abstract	The purpose of this study was to examine whether fairness assessed in a widely used multisource instrument written by practitioners possessed a similar factor structure as fairness measured in academic literature, and whether different groups based on their relationship to the ratee (e.g., peers, subordinates, supervisors) perceived a similar structure to the construct.Multisource data were collected for 141 managers from a variety of organizations across the United States, who participated in a leadership development program offered by Personnel Decisions International (PDI), a global management consulting firm.The study results show that fairness measured with a widely used multisource instrument indeed assesses the same construct as that examined in the academic literature. Peers, subordinates, and supervisors perceived fairness similarly, whereas self-reports of fairness differed, suggesting that they function as a systematic source of variance in the measurement of fairness.The findings in this study demonstrate that leaders can be confident that their constituents are all conceptualizing fairness the same way, such that differences are meaningful and not due to differences in the understanding of the items in the instrument.The proliferation of the use of multisource feedback instruments in leadership development programs has facilitated the assessment of the fairness of managers. This study shows that perceptions of fairness of the manager as reported by his or her constituencies (e.g., peers, supervisor, subordinates) change very little as a function of who is doing the perceiving, which heretofore has not been shown.
Starting Page	51
Ending Page	64
Page Count	14
File Format	PDF
ISSN	08893268
Journal	Journal of Business and Psychology
Volume Number	24
Issue Number	1
e-ISSN	1573353X
Language	English
Publisher	Springer US
Publisher Date	2009-02-19
Publisher Place	Boston
Access Restriction	One Nation One Subscription (ONOS)
Subject Keyword	Justice Fairness Factor structure Multiple-group analysis Social Sciences Business/Management Science Personality and Social Psychology Community and Environmental Psychology
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Article
Subject	Business and International Management Applied Psychology

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

Applicant Personality and Procedural Justice Perceptions of Group Selection Interviews

Perceived fairness in employee selection: the role of applicant personality

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN JUSTICE AND BENEFITS SATISFACTION

A Dynamic Approach to Fairness: Effects of Temporal Changes of Fairness Perceptions on Job Attitudes

Applicant Personality and Procedural Justice Perceptions of Group Selection Interviews

A Dispositional Approach to Applicant Reactions: Examining Core Self-Evaluations, Behavioral Intentions, and Fairness Perceptions

Middle Response Functioning in Likert-responses to Personality Items

The Role of Attributions and Fairness in Understanding Job Applicant Reactions to Selection Procedures and Decisions

Workplace Romance: A Justice Analysis

Is Justice the Same for Everyone? Examining Fairness Items Using Multiple-group Analysis

Similar Documents

Applicant Personality and Procedural Justice Perceptions of Group Selection Interviews

Perceived fairness in employee selection: the role of applicant personality

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN JUSTICE AND BENEFITS SATISFACTION

A Dynamic Approach to Fairness: Effects of Temporal Changes of Fairness Perceptions on Job Attitudes

Applicant Personality and Procedural Justice Perceptions of Group Selection Interviews

A Dispositional Approach to Applicant Reactions: Examining Core Self-Evaluations, Behavioral Intentions, and Fairness Perceptions

Middle Response Functioning in Likert-responses to Personality Items

The Role of Attributions and Fairness in Understanding Job Applicant Reactions to Selection Procedures and Decisions

Workplace Romance: A Justice Analysis

Is Justice the Same for Everyone? Examining Fairness Items Using Multiple-group Analysis