NDLI: A comparative study of the coated filler method and the admixture method of powder metallurgy for making metal

Content Provider	Springer Nature Link
Author	Yih, PAY Chung, D. D. L
Copyright Year	1997
Abstract	Copper–matrix composites were made by powder metallurgy (PM). The reinforcements were molybdenum particles, silicon carbide whiskers and titanium diboride platelets. The coated filler method, which involves a reinforcement coated with the matrix metal, was used. In contrast, conventional PM uses the admixture method, which involves a mixture of matrix powder and reinforcement. For all the composite systems, the coated filler method was found to be superior to the admixture method in providing composites with lower porosity, greater hardness, higher compressive yield strength, lower coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE), higher thermal conductivity and lower electrical resistivity, though the degree of superiority was greater for high than low reinforcement contents. In the coated filler method, the coating on the reinforcement separated reinforcement units from one another and provided a cleaner interface and stronger bond between reinforcement and matrix than the admixture method could provide. The highest reinforcement content attained in dense composites (<5% porosity) made by the coated filler method was 70 vol% Mo, 60 vol% TiB2 and 54 vol% SiC. The critical reinforcement volume fraction above which the porosity of composites made by the admixture method increases abruptly is 60% Mo, 42% TiB2 and 33% SiC. This fraction increases with decreasing aspect ratio of the reinforcement. Among Cu/Mo, Cu/TiB2 and Cu/SiC at the same reinforcement volume fraction (50%), Cu/Mo gave the lowest CTE, highest thermal conductivity and lowest electrical resistivity, while Cu/SiC gave the greatest hardness and Cu/TiB2 and Cu/SiC gave the highest compressive yield strength. Compared to Cu/SiC, Cu/TiB2 exhibited much higher thermal conductivity and much lower electrical resistivity.
Starting Page	2873
Ending Page	2882
Page Count	10
File Format	PDF
ISSN	00222461
Journal	Journal of Materials Science
Volume Number	32
Issue Number	11
e-ISSN	15734803
Language	English
Publisher	Kluwer Academic Publishers
Publisher Date	1997-01-01
Publisher Place	Boston
Access Restriction	One Nation One Subscription (ONOS)
Subject Keyword	Polymer Sciences Materials Science Characterization and Evaluation Materials Mechanics Crystallography Continuum Mechanics and Mechanics of Materials
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Article
Subject	Ceramics and Composites Mechanics of Materials Mechanical Engineering Polymers and Plastics

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

Mechanical energy dissipation using carbon fiber polymer–matrix structural composites with filler incorporation

Fabrication of TiC$_{p}$/Mg composites by powder metallurgy

Fabrication of CuSiC metal matrix composites

Wetting and laser brazing of Zn-coated steel products by Cu–Si filler metal

Filler–matrix debonding in glass bead-filled polystyrene

Friction-stir welding of a beryllium-aluminum powder metallurgy alloy

Mechanical properties of three-dimensional interconnected alumina/steel metal matrix composites

The processing and characterization of sintered metal-reinforced aluminium matrix composites

Microstructure of AA2024-SiC nanostructured metal matrix composites

A comparative study of the coated filler method and the admixture method of powder metallurgy for making metal–matrix composites

Similar Documents

Mechanical energy dissipation using carbon fiber polymer–matrix structural composites with filler incorporation

Fabrication of TiC$_{p}$/Mg composites by powder metallurgy

Fabrication of CuSiC metal matrix composites

Wetting and laser brazing of Zn-coated steel products by Cu–Si filler metal

Filler–matrix debonding in glass bead-filled polystyrene

Friction-stir welding of a beryllium-aluminum powder metallurgy alloy

Mechanical properties of three-dimensional interconnected alumina/steel metal matrix composites

The processing and characterization of sintered metal-reinforced aluminium matrix composites

Microstructure of AA2024-SiC nanostructured metal matrix composites

A comparative study of the coated filler method and the admixture method of powder metallurgy for making metal–matrix composites