NDLI: Disagreement: Ethics and Elsewhere

Content Provider	Springer Nature Link
Author	Tersman, Folke
Copyright Year	2013
Abstract	According to a traditional argument against moral realism, the existence of objective moral facts is hard to reconcile with the existence of radical disagreement over moral issues. An increasingly popular response to this argument is to insist that it generalizes too easily. Thus, it has been argued that if one rejects moral realism on the basis of disagreement then one is committed to similar views about epistemology and meta-ethics itself, since the disagreements that arise in those areas are just as deep as the moral ones. This in turn is taken to show that a moral anti-realist should seek another basis for her position. For, if she extends her anti-realism also to epistemology and meta-ethics, then she is no longer in a position to say that her meta-ethical position is (objectively) true or that it is a fact that we have reason to accept it. She therefore seems left with a position that hardly even seems to be a position. The purpose of the paper is to challenge this response and in particular the claim that the argument from disagreement applies equally well to epistemology and meta-ethics as it does to ethics. It is argued that, despite contrary appearances, there are crucial differences between the disagreements that occur in ethics compared to those that arise in the other areas. Moreover, even granted that the disagreements are just as deep, there are other differences between the areas that nevertheless justify drawing different conclusions about their status from the existence of those disagreements.
Starting Page	55
Ending Page	72
Page Count	18
File Format	PDF
ISSN	01650106
Journal	Erkenntnis
Volume Number	79
Issue Number	1
e-ISSN	15728420
Language	English
Publisher	Springer Netherlands
Publisher Date	2013-02-20
Publisher Place	Dordrecht
Access Restriction	One Nation One Subscription (ONOS)
Subject Keyword	Philosophy Epistemology Ontology Ethics Logic
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Article
Subject	Philosophy Logic

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

Epistemic Disagreement and Practical Disagreement

Doxastic Disagreement

Contextualism and Disagreement

Disagreement Without Error

Modeling Value Disagreement

Confidence, Evidence, and Disagreement

Disagreement, Relativism and Doxastic Revision

Peer Disagreement and Independence Preservation

Resolving Disagreement Through Mutual Respect

Disagreement: Ethics and Elsewhere

Similar Documents

Epistemic Disagreement and Practical Disagreement

Doxastic Disagreement

Contextualism and Disagreement

Disagreement Without Error

Modeling Value Disagreement

Confidence, Evidence, and Disagreement

Disagreement, Relativism and Doxastic Revision

Peer Disagreement and Independence Preservation

Resolving Disagreement Through Mutual Respect

Disagreement: Ethics and Elsewhere