NDLI: Presenting software engineering results using structured abstracts: a randomised experiment

Content Provider	Springer Nature Link
Author	Budgen, David Kitchenham, Barbara A. Charters, Stuart M. Turner, Mark Brereton, Pearl Linkman, Stephen G.
Copyright Year	2008
Abstract	When conducting a systematic literature review, researchers usually determine the relevance of primary studies on the basis of the title and abstract. However, experience indicates that the abstracts for many software engineering papers are of too poor a quality to be used for this purpose. A solution adopted in other domains is to employ structured abstracts to improve the quality of information provided. This study consists of a formal experiment to investigate whether structured abstracts are more complete and easier to understand than non-structured abstracts for papers that describe software engineering experiments. We constructed structured versions of the abstracts for a random selection of 25 papers describing software engineering experiments. The 64 participants were each presented with one abstract in its original unstructured form and one in a structured form, and for each one were asked to assess its clarity (measured on a scale of 1 to 10) and completeness (measured with a questionnaire that used 18 items). Based on a regression analysis that adjusted for participant, abstract, type of abstract seen first, knowledge of structured abstracts, software engineering role, and preference for conventional or structured abstracts, the use of structured abstracts increased the completeness score by 6.65 (SE 0.37, p < 0.001) and the clarity score by 2.98 (SE 0.23, p < 0.001). 57 participants reported their preferences regarding structured abstracts: 13 (23%) had no preference; 40 (70%) preferred structured abstracts; four preferred conventional abstracts. Many conventional software engineering abstracts omit important information. Our study is consistent with studies from other disciplines and confirms that structured abstracts can improve both information content and readability. Although care must be taken to develop appropriate structures for different types of article, we recommend that Software Engineering journals and conferences adopt structured abstracts.
Starting Page	435
Ending Page	468
Page Count	34
File Format	PDF
ISSN	13823256
Journal	Empirical Software Engineering
Volume Number	13
Issue Number	4
e-ISSN	15737616
Language	English
Publisher	Springer US
Publisher Date	2008-07-17
Publisher Place	Boston
Access Restriction	One Nation One Subscription (ONOS)
Subject Keyword	Structured abstract Randomised controlled laboratory experiment Programming Languages, Compilers, Interpreters Software Engineering/Programming and Operating Systems
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Article
Subject	Software

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

Reporting computing projects through structured abstracts: a quasi-experiment

A Controlled Experiment to Evaluate On-Line Process Guidance

An Introduction to “Dissertation Abstracts”

How programmers read regular code: a controlled experiment using eye tracking

Viewpoint Article: Conducting and Presenting Empirical Software Engineering

Assessing the Changeability of two Object-Oriented Design Alternatives--a Controlled Experiment

Viewpoint: PhD Abstract Publication in Empirical Software Engineering

Software requirements prioritization and selection using linguistic tools and constraint solvers—a controlled experiment

A Replicated Experiment to Assess Requirements Inspection Techniques

Presenting software engineering results using structured abstracts: a randomised experiment

Similar Documents

Reporting computing projects through structured abstracts: a quasi-experiment

A Controlled Experiment to Evaluate On-Line Process Guidance

An Introduction to “Dissertation Abstracts”

How programmers read regular code: a controlled experiment using eye tracking

Viewpoint Article: Conducting and Presenting Empirical Software Engineering

Assessing the Changeability of two Object-Oriented Design Alternatives--a Controlled Experiment

Viewpoint: PhD Abstract Publication in Empirical Software Engineering

Software requirements prioritization and selection using linguistic tools and constraint solvers—a controlled experiment

A Replicated Experiment to Assess Requirements Inspection Techniques

Presenting software engineering results using structured abstracts: a randomised experiment