NDLI: Legal Aid, Self-Representation, And The Crisis At The Hague Tribunal

Content Provider	Springer Nature Link
Author	Zahar, Alexander
Copyright Year	2008
Abstract	The unfolding of the case of Prosecutor v. Vojislav ŠeŠelj at the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) has been dramatic and more than a little chaotic. The author argues that it is diagnostic of a broader crisis at the Tribunal. As an experiment in international justice, the ad hoc tribunal model has proved to be expensive and slow, but on several points also procedurally arbitrary, intellectually unconvincing, and vulnerable to improper political considerations. These problems have attained a critical mass in ŠeŠelj’s case, as illustrated here. The accused ŠeŠelj, an ultranationalist politician and former paramilitary leader, has vowed to bring the Tribunal to its knees. He is self- represented at trial. This privilege was twice reaffirmed in 2006 by the ICTY Appeals Chamber, having been twice revoked by a bench of trial judges. In 2007, the new pre-trial judge in the case (now presiding judge), Jean-Claude Antonetti, declared that a self-represented accused who can prove indigence is entitled to legal aid. He ordered the Registrar of the Tribunal to pay ŠeŠelj’s defence expenses from the Tribunal’s legal aid budget if ŠeŠelj could prove his indigence. The author argues that while there is good reason to disburse legal aid funds to an indigent accused who has been granted privileges of self-representation, this entitlement was not convincingly explained by Antonetti. Moreover, ŠeŠelj’s destructive aims were improperly set aside by Antonetti in reaching his decision on the public financing of his defence. The current situation, which represents the combined effort of the Appeals Chamber and Antonetti, allows ŠeŠelj to bully participants in the proceedings, issue thinly veiled threats to prospective witnesses and the public at large, and bend the trial procedure to the requirements of his political populism. The poor handling of this case by the Tribunal as a whole calls into question the ad hoc tribunal model of international criminal justice.
Starting Page	241
Ending Page	263
Page Count	23
File Format	PDF
ISSN	10468374
Journal	Criminal Law Forum
Volume Number	19
Issue Number	2
e-ISSN	15729850
Language	English
Publisher	Springer Netherlands
Publisher Date	2008-05-28
Publisher Place	Dordrecht
Access Restriction	One Nation One Subscription (ONOS)
Subject Keyword	International Economics European Law/Public International Law International & Foreign Law/Comparative Law Criminal Law
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Article
Subject	Law

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

Plea Bargaining at the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia

Developments in the Law of Procedure and Evidence at the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Criminal Court

Disclosure of Evidence Before the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda

Drafting of Indictments for the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda

Fair Trial and the Customary Courts in Botswana: Questions on Legal Representation

The Right to Counsel Before the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda

Command Responsibility in the Case Law of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda

The Intent to Commit Genocide in the Case Law of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda

‘A Fool for a Client’ – Remarks on the Freedom of Choice and Assignment of Counsel at the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia

Legal Aid, Self-Representation, And The Crisis At The Hague Tribunal

Similar Documents

Plea Bargaining at the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia

Developments in the Law of Procedure and Evidence at the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Criminal Court

Disclosure of Evidence Before the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda

Drafting of Indictments for the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda

Fair Trial and the Customary Courts in Botswana: Questions on Legal Representation

The Right to Counsel Before the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda

Command Responsibility in the Case Law of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda

The Intent to Commit Genocide in the Case Law of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda

‘A Fool for a Client’ – Remarks on the Freedom of Choice and Assignment of Counsel at the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia

Legal Aid, Self-Representation, And The Crisis At The Hague Tribunal