NDLI: Saving lives in earthquakes: successes and failures in seismic protection since 1960

Please wait, while we are loading the content...

Saving lives in earthquakes: successes and failures in seismic protection since 1960

Content Provider	Springer Nature Link
Author	Spence, Robin
Copyright Year	2007
Abstract	This paper will look at what we have and have not achieved in reducing the risks to human life from earthquakes in the last 50 years. It will review how success has been achieved in a few parts of the world, and consider what needs to be done by the scientific and engineering community globally to assist in the future task of bringing earthquake risks under control. The first part of the talk will re-examine what we know about the casualties from earthquakes in the last 50 years. Almost 80% of about 1 million deaths turn out to have been caused by just ten great earthquakes, together affecting a tiny proportion of the territory at risk from heavy ground shaking. The disparity between richer and poorer countries is also evident, not only in fatality rates, but also in their rates of change. But the existing casualty database turns out to be a very poor basis for observing such differences, not only because of the small number of lethal events, but also because of the very limited data on causes of death, types and causes of injury. These have been examined in detail in only a few, recent events. All that can be said with certainty is that a few wealthier earthquake-prone countries or regions have made impressive progress in reducing the risk of death from earthquakes, while most of the rest of the world has achieved comparatively little, and in some areas the problem has become much worse. The second part of the paper looks in more detail at what has been achieved country-by-country. Based on a new expert-group survey of key individuals involved in earthquake risk mitigation, it will examine what are perceived to be the successes and failures of risk mitigation in each country or group of countries. This survey will be used to highlight the achievements of those countries which have successfully tackled their earthquake risk; it will examine the processes of earthquake risk mitigation, from campaigning to retrofitting, and it will consider to what extent the achievement is the result of affluence, scientific and technical activity, political advocacy, public awareness, or the experience of destructive events. It will ask to what extent the approaches pioneered by the global leaders can be adopted by the rest. The final section of the talk will argue that it can be useful to view earthquake protection activity as a public health matter to be advanced in a manner similar to globally successful disease-control measures: it will be argued that the key components of such programmes—building in protection; harnessing new technology and creating a safety culture—must be the key components of earthquake protection strategies also. It will consider the contribution which the scientific and engineering community can make to bringing down today’s unacceptably high global earthquake risk. It will be suggested that this role is wider than commonly understood and needs to include: Building-in protection Improving and simplifying information available for designers and self-builders of homes and infrastructure. Devising and running “building for safety” programmes to support local builders. Harnessing new technologies Developing and testing cost-effective techniques for new construction and retrofit. Creating a safety culture Involvement in raising public awareness. Political advocacy to support new legislation and other actions. Prioritising action on public buildings, especially schools and hospitals. Examples of some of these actions will be given. International collaboration is essential to ensure that the resources and expertise available in the richer countries is shared with those most in need of help. And perhaps the most important single task for the engineering community is work to counter the widespread fatalistic attitude that future earthquakes are bound to be at least as destructive as those of the past.
Starting Page	139
Ending Page	251
Page Count	113
File Format	PDF
ISSN	1570761X
Journal	Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Volume Number	5
Issue Number	2
e-ISSN	15731456
Language	English
Publisher	Kluwer Academic Publishers
Publisher Date	2007-03-17
Publisher Place	Dordrecht
Access Restriction	One Nation One Subscription (ONOS)
Subject Keyword	Earthquakes Building damage Casualties Mitigation Structural Geology Hydrogeology Geophysics/Geodesy Civil Engineering Geotechnical Engineering
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Article
Subject	Building and Construction Geophysics Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology Civil and Structural Engineering

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

Estimating shaking-induced casualties and building damage for global earthquake events: a proposed modelling approach

Comparing recent Italian earthquakes

The seismic future of cities

Design Earthquakes in the U.K.

Seismic vulnerability of lifelines in the greater Lisbon area

Investigation of dynamic response of masonry minaret structures

National Civil Protection Organization and technical activities in the 2012 Emilia earthquakes (Italy)

Guest editorial: Structural seismic safety assessment

Building damage assessment after the 2009 Abruzzi earthquake

Saving lives in earthquakes: successes and failures in seismic protection since 1960

Similar Documents

Estimating shaking-induced casualties and building damage for global earthquake events: a proposed modelling approach

Comparing recent Italian earthquakes

The seismic future of cities

Design Earthquakes in the U.K.

Seismic vulnerability of lifelines in the greater Lisbon area

Investigation of dynamic response of masonry minaret structures

National Civil Protection Organization and technical activities in the 2012 Emilia earthquakes (Italy)

Guest editorial: Structural seismic safety assessment

Building damage assessment after the 2009 Abruzzi earthquake

Saving lives in earthquakes: successes and failures in seismic protection since 1960