NDLI: Emergent vs. Dogmatic Arguing

Content Provider	Springer Nature Link
Author	Rühl, Marco
Copyright Year	2001
Abstract	More than current scholarship in argumentation suggests, successful defense of standpoints depends on learning. As long as arguers comply with a minimum co-operativity, argumentation has genuinely an epistemic interest insofar as any position agreed upon becomes agreeable, i.e., intersubjectively shared because those who did not share it have learned why it is agreeable. Since the epistemic interest of argumentation is absent from most of current scholarship, `intersubjectification' is basically treated as being always possible. In this paper I argue that `intersubjectification' – the `matching of the arguers' communicative backgrounds,' as I will term it – is not a given, but a communicative activity which may or may not succeed. Hence, different types of arguing come into being, depending on how and what arguers are prepared to learn. In the paper, examples are given for unproblematic `intersubjectification,' for `intersubjectification' that requires considerable argumentative co-operation, and for `intersubjectification' that fails utterly. From the analyses, a continuous scale of types of communicative processes of arguing is presented that ranges from one extreme case, termed `dogmatic arguing,' to another extreme case, termed `emergent arguing.'
Starting Page	151
Ending Page	171
Page Count	21
File Format	PDF
ISSN	0920427X
Journal	Argumentation
Volume Number	15
Issue Number	2
e-ISSN	15728374
Language	English
Publisher	Kluwer Academic Publishers
Publisher Date	2001-01-01
Publisher Place	Dordrecht
Access Restriction	One Nation One Subscription (ONOS)
Subject Keyword	Logic Communication
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Article
Subject	Philosophy Linguistics and Language

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

Arguing to Display Identity

Tindale, Christopher W. (2000). Acts of Arguing: A Rhetorical Model of Argument

Arguing at Cross-Purposes: Discharging the Dialectical Obligations of the Coalescent Model of Argumentation

Does Arguing from Coherence Make Sense?

Going Multimodal: What is a Mode of Arguing and Why Does it Matter?

The Search for Grounds in Legal Argumentation: A Rhetorical Analysis of Texas vs Johnson

What’s So Funny About Arguing with God? A Case for Playful Argumentation from Jewish Literature

W. Peter Robinson, Arguing to Better Conclusions. A Human Odyssey

Philosophical Argumentation: Logic and Rhetoric

Emergent vs. Dogmatic Arguing

Similar Documents

Arguing to Display Identity

Tindale, Christopher W. (2000). Acts of Arguing: A Rhetorical Model of Argument

Arguing at Cross-Purposes: Discharging the Dialectical Obligations of the Coalescent Model of Argumentation

Does Arguing from Coherence Make Sense?

Going Multimodal: What is a Mode of Arguing and Why Does it Matter?

The Search for Grounds in Legal Argumentation: A Rhetorical Analysis of Texas vs Johnson

What’s So Funny About Arguing with God? A Case for Playful Argumentation from Jewish Literature

W. Peter Robinson, Arguing to Better Conclusions. A Human Odyssey

Philosophical Argumentation: Logic and Rhetoric

Emergent vs. Dogmatic Arguing