NDLI: Standard Setting in a Small Scale OSCE: A Comparison of the Modified Borderline-Group Method and the Borderline Regression Method

Please wait, while we are loading the content...

Assessment of Readability and Learning of Easy-to-Read Educational Health Materials Designed and Written with the Help of Citizens by Means of Two Non-Alternative Methods

A Two-day Teacher-Training Programme for Medical Residents: Investigating the Impact on Teaching Ability

Investigating the Utility of a GPA Institutional Adjustment Index

Differential Effects of Two Types of Formative Assessment in Predicting Performance of First-year Medical Students

Standard Setting for Clinical Competence at Graduation from Medical School: A Comparison of Passing Scores Across Five Medical Schools

Shaping Understanding of HIV Through Negotiation and Conflict Resolution During Peer Group Discussion

Anatomy Instruction in Medical Schools: Connecting the Past and the Future

Advances in Health Sciences Education : Volume 11, Issue 1, February 2006

Advances in Health Sciences Education : Volume 10

Advances in Health Sciences Education : Volume 9

Advances in Health Sciences Education : Volume 8

Advances in Health Sciences Education : Volume 7

Advances in Health Sciences Education : Volume 6

Advances in Health Sciences Education : Volume 5

Advances in Health Sciences Education : Volume 4

Advances in Health Sciences Education : Volume 3

Advances in Health Sciences Education : Volume 2

Standard Setting in a Small Scale OSCE: A Comparison of the Modified Borderline-Group Method and the Borderline Regression Method

Content Provider	Springer Nature Link
Author	Wood, Timothy J. Humphrey Murto, Susan M. rman, Geoffrey R.
Copyright Year	2006
Abstract	When setting standards, administrators of small-scale OSCEs often face several challenges, including a lack of resources, a lack of available expertise in statistics, and difficulty in recruiting judges. The Modified Borderline-Group Method is a standard setting procedure that compensates for these challenges by using physician examiners and is easy to use making it a good choice for small scale OSCEs. Unfortunately, the use of this approach may introduce a new challenge. Because a small scale OSCE has a small number of examinees, there may be few examinees in the borderline range, which could introduce an unintentional bias. A standard setting method called The Borderline Regression Method will be described. This standard setting method is similar to the Modified Borderline-Group Method but incorporates a linear regression approach allowing the cut score to be set using the scores from all examinees and not from a subset. The current study uses confidence intervals to analyze the precision of cut scores derived from both approaches when applied to a small scale OSCE.
Starting Page	115
Ending Page	122
Page Count	8
File Format	PDF
ISSN	13824996
Journal	Advances in Health Sciences Education
Volume Number	11
Issue Number	2
e-ISSN	15731677
Language	English
Publisher	Kluwer Academic Publishers
Publisher Date	2006-01-01
Publisher Place	Dordrecht
Access Restriction	One Nation One Subscription (ONOS)
Subject Keyword	standard setting OSCE Medical Education
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Article
Subject	Education Medicine

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

Comparing Standard Setting Methods for Objective Structured Clinical Examinations in a Caribbean Medical School

Who will pass the dental OSCE? Comparison of the Angoff and the borderline regression standard setting methods.

A Modified Contrasting Groups Method Used for Setting the Passmark in a Small Scale Standardised Patient Examination

The Objective Borderline method (OBM): a probability-based model for setting up an objective pass/fail cut-off score in medical programme assessments

Standard setting made easy: validating the Equal Z-score (EZ) method for setting cut-score for clinical examinations

Standard Setting for OSCEs: Trial of Borderline Approach

Assessing the reliability of the borderline regression method as a standard setting procedure for objective structured clinical examination

Quantifying error in OSCE standard setting for varying cohort sizes: A resampling approach to measuring assessment quality.

Is the assumption of equal distances between global assessment categories used in borderline regression valid?

Standard Setting in a Small Scale OSCE: A Comparison of the Modified Borderline-Group Method and the Borderline Regression Method

Similar Documents

Comparing Standard Setting Methods for Objective Structured Clinical Examinations in a Caribbean Medical School

Who will pass the dental OSCE? Comparison of the Angoff and the borderline regression standard setting methods.

A Modified Contrasting Groups Method Used for Setting the Passmark in a Small Scale Standardised Patient Examination

The Objective Borderline method (OBM): a probability-based model for setting up an objective pass/fail cut-off score in medical programme assessments

Standard setting made easy: validating the Equal Z-score (EZ) method for setting cut-score for clinical examinations

Standard Setting for OSCEs: Trial of Borderline Approach

Assessing the reliability of the borderline regression method as a standard setting procedure for objective structured clinical examination

Quantifying error in OSCE standard setting for varying cohort sizes: A resampling approach to measuring assessment quality.

Is the assumption of equal distances between global assessment categories used in borderline regression valid?

Standard Setting in a Small Scale OSCE: A Comparison of the Modified Borderline-Group Method and the Borderline Regression Method