Please wait, while we are loading the content...
Please wait, while we are loading the content...
| Content Provider | Springer Nature Link |
|---|---|
| Author | Rehbein, St. Lutz, Walburga Visser, M. Winter, Renate |
| Copyright Year | 2000 |
| Abstract | Die Endoparasitenfauna von 64 Rehen (13<1 Jahr, 16 ∼ 1 Jahr, 35>1 Jahr) aus den Jagdjahren 1997/98 und 1998/99 aus 5 Herkunftsgebieten im südlichen Nordrhein-Westfalen wurde untersucht. Dabei wurden eine Zestodenart (Taenia hydatigena-Zystizerken) und 28 Nematodenarten nachgewiesen. Im Kehlkopf bzw. in der Luftröhre von 2 Rehen sind wenigeCephenemyia stimulator-Larven gefunden worden. Alle Rehe waren mit Magen-Darm-Nematoden befallen und 32,8 % mit Lungenwürmern (14,1 % mitDictyocaulus eckerti und 29,7 % mitVarestrongylus capreoli). Leber- und Pansenegel waren nicht nachweisbar. Bei einem Reh sindSetaria tundra-Filarien gefunden worden. Alle Rehe waren mit Labmagennematoden infiziert, 68,8 % bzw. 89,1 % mit Dünn- bzw. Dickdarmnematoden. Die am häufigsten gefundenen Nematodenarten warenOstertagia leptospicularis (95,3 %),Spiculopteragia böhmi (87,5 %),Skrjabinagia kolchida (85,9 %),Trichuris globulosa (67,2 %),Trichostrongylus capricola (60,9 %) undOesophagostomum venulosum (50 %). Der Labmagen war der am stärksten parasitierte Abschnitt des Verdauungskanals, gefolgt von Dünn- und Dickdarm. Die Rehe aus 4 Herkunftsgebieten beherbergten durchschnittlich (geometrisches Mittel) 588, 688, 854 bzw. 1019 Magen-Darm-Nematoden, die aus dem fünften Gebiet, in dem mit 12.052 auch die höchste individuelle Wurmbürde gefunden wurde, im Mittel 2351 Nematoden. Eine differenzierte Betrachtung des Befalls des Rehe aus diesem Gebiet weist auf einen Zusammenhang zwischen der Befallsstärke und der Kondition der Tiere hin. Die aus dem Bereich mit starkem Rehwild stammenden Tiere (n=12) beherbergten deutlich weniger Nematoden als die im Bereich mit schwachem Rehwild erlegten Tiere (n=20): 1396 bzw. 3214 Würmer (geometrisches Mittel).Haemonchus contortus-Würmer sind dabei nur bei einem der erstgenannten Rehe nachgewiesen worden (40 Exemplare), aber bei 16 der letztgenannten Rehe (40–3150 Exemplare).The endoparasite fauna of 64 roe deer (13<1 year, 16∼1 year, 35>1 year) which were shot during the hunting seasons 1997/98 and 1998/99 was examined. The roe deer originated from five areas from the south of Northrhine-Westfalia, Germany. In all, one cestode species (Cysticercus tenuicollis ofTaenia hydatigena) and 28 nematode species were recorded.Cephenemyia stimulator larvae were found in the larynx/trachea of two animals. All animals harboured gastrointestinal parasites and 32.8% lung-worms (14.1 %Dictyocaulus eckerti and 29.7 %Varestrongylus capreoli). Liver flukes and rumen flukes were not seen.Setaria tundra filariae were found in one animal. The prevalence of nematodes in the abomasum, small intestine and large intestine was 100 %, 68.8 % or 89.1 %, respectively. The most prevalent species wereOstertagia leptospicularis (95.3 %),Spiculopteragia böhmi (87.5 %),Skrjabinagia kolchida (85.9 %),Trichuris globulosa (67.2 %),Trichostrongylus capricola (60.9 %) andOesophagostomum venulosum (50 %).The abomasum haboured the highest worm burden, followed by the small intestine and large intestine. The geometric mean gastrointestinal nematode counts of the roe deer from four areas were 588, 688, 854 or 1019 worms, however, in the other area it was 2351 nematodes including the highest individual burden recorded in this study (12,052). The comparison of nematode counts of roe deer from the latter area suggested a relationship of nematode counts and body condition. Animals originating from a district with roe deer in good condition (n=12) harboured much fewer gastrointestinal nematodes than animals which originated from a district with roe deer in poor condition (n=20): 1396 vs. 3214 worms (geometric mean counts). In addition,Haemonchus contortus was recorded in only one of the former animals (40 nematodes) but it was found in 16 of the latter animals (40–3150 nematodes).La faune endoparasitaire de 64 chevreuils (13<1an, 16 de ∼ 1 an, 35>1an) recueillis à la faveur des saisons de chasse 1997–98 et 1998–99 et provenant de 5 territories du Sud de la Rhénanie-Westphalie a été étudiée. A cette occasion, une espèce de Cestode (Cysticercus tenuicollis deTaenia hydatigena) et 28 espèces de nématodes ont été identifiées. Des larves deCephenemyia stimulator ont été trouvées dans le larynx et/ou thorax de deux animaux. Tous les animaux étaient porteurs de parasites gastrointestinaux et 32,8 % de vers pulmonaires (14,1 % deDictyocaulus eckerti et 29,7 % deVarestrongylus capreoli). La présence de douves hépatique et stomacle n'a pu être mise en évidence. Dans un chevreuil, l'on a trouvé des filaires deSetaria tundra. Tous les chevreuils étaient contaminés par des nématodes de la caillette, 68,8 et 89,1 % étant respectivement contaminés par des nématodes de l'intestin grèle et du gros intestin. Les espèces de nématodes les plus fréquentes étaientOstertagia leptospicularis (95,3 %),Spiculopteragia böhmi (87,5 %),Skrjabinagia kolchida (85,9 %,Trichuris globulosa (67,2 %),Trichostrongylus capricola (60,9 %) etOesophagostomum venulosum (50 %). La caillette était la section la plus parasitée du système digestif, suivie de l'intestin grêle et du gros intestin. Les chevreuils des 4 territoires d'origine hébergeaient en moyenne (moyenne géométrique) 588, 688, 854 et 1019 nématodes stomacaux et intestinaux; quant au cinquième, avec 12052 parasites, il atteignait la charge parasitaire la plus élevée avec 2351 nématodes. Une considération différenciée de l'infection parasitaire du Chevreuil dans ce territoire montre une corrélation entre le degré de contamination et la condition physique de l'animal. Les sujets provenant de territoires où les animaux étaient vigoureux (n=12) hébergeaient beaucoup moins de nématodes que ceux provenant de territoires où les animaux étaient de mauvaise venue (n=20), soit respectivement 1396 et 3214 vers (moyenne géométrique). En outre, les vers d'Haemonchus contortus n'ont été observés que chez un sujet du premier groupe (40 exemplaires) alors que 16 sujets étaient atteints dans le second groupe avec 40 à 3150 exemplaires. |
| Starting Page | 248 |
| Ending Page | 269 |
| Page Count | 22 |
| File Format | |
| ISSN | 00442887 |
| Journal | European Journal of Wildlife Research |
| Volume Number | 46 |
| Issue Number | 4 |
| e-ISSN | 14390574 |
| Language | French |
| Publisher | Springer-Verlag |
| Publisher Date | 2000-01-01 |
| Publisher Place | Berlin, Heidelberg |
| Access Restriction | One Nation One Subscription (ONOS) |
| Subject Keyword | Animal Ecology Zoology |
| Content Type | Text |
| Resource Type | Article |
| Subject | Ecology Animal Science and Zoology |
National Digital Library of India (NDLI) is a virtual repository of learning resources which is not just a repository with search/browse facilities but provides a host of services for the learner community. It is sponsored and mentored by Ministry of Education, Government of India, through its National Mission on Education through Information and Communication Technology (NMEICT). Filtered and federated searching is employed to facilitate focused searching so that learners can find the right resource with least effort and in minimum time. NDLI provides user group-specific services such as Examination Preparatory for School and College students and job aspirants. Services for Researchers and general learners are also provided. NDLI is designed to hold content of any language and provides interface support for 10 most widely used Indian languages. It is built to provide support for all academic levels including researchers and life-long learners, all disciplines, all popular forms of access devices and differently-abled learners. It is designed to enable people to learn and prepare from best practices from all over the world and to facilitate researchers to perform inter-linked exploration from multiple sources. It is developed, operated and maintained from Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur.
Learn more about this project from here.
NDLI is a conglomeration of freely available or institutionally contributed or donated or publisher managed contents. Almost all these contents are hosted and accessed from respective sources. The responsibility for authenticity, relevance, completeness, accuracy, reliability and suitability of these contents rests with the respective organization and NDLI has no responsibility or liability for these. Every effort is made to keep the NDLI portal up and running smoothly unless there are some unavoidable technical issues.
Ministry of Education, through its National Mission on Education through Information and Communication Technology (NMEICT), has sponsored and funded the National Digital Library of India (NDLI) project.
| Sl. | Authority | Responsibilities | Communication Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education |
Sanctioning Authority | https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives |
| 2 | Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur | Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project | https://www.iitkgp.ac.in |
| 3 | National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur | The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project | Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in |
| 4 | Project PI / Joint PI | Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project |
Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon |
| 5 | Website/Portal (Helpdesk) | Queries regarding NDLI and its services | support@ndl.gov.in |
| 6 | Contents and Copyright Issues | Queries related to content curation and copyright issues | content@ndl.gov.in |
| 7 | National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club) | Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach | clubsupport@ndl.gov.in |
| 8 | Digital Preservation Centre (DPC) | Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books | dpc@ndl.gov.in |
| 9 | IDR Setup or Support | Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops | idr@ndl.gov.in |
|
Loading...
|