Please wait, while we are loading the content...
Please wait, while we are loading the content...
| Content Provider | Springer Nature Link |
|---|---|
| Author | Schlager, Edella |
| Copyright Year | 2005 |
| Abstract | Over the last several decades, water users in the western United States have increasingly turned to groundwater resources to support economic development, but few institutional arrangements were in place to govern groundwater use. Over time, numerous groundwater problems have emerged. Two closely related explanations for this are explored. Surface water sources were the first to be developed, and institutional arrangements to allocate surface water were the first to be devised. These arrangements are not particularly well suited for governing groundwater. Furthermore, the physical differences between rivers and aquifers lead to differences in the development of each type of water, and in production and organization costs. Groundwater development involves low upfront production costs, which individual water users can cover. Once groundwater users have individually invested in productive activities problems emerge, such as declining water tables. Thus, unlike surface water users, groundwater users are faced with devising institutional arrangements to coordinate their water uses after they have invested in and developed productive economic activities. Most western states regulate pumping, although groundwater users, in general, resist pumping limits. The discussion concludes with proposals for modifying the prior appropriation doctrine to better accommodate the active management of groundwater basins for long-term sustainability.Sur les dernières decades, les utilisateurs d'eau dans l'Ouest des Etats-Unis se sont tournés en nombre croissant vers les ressources en eau souterraine, pour supporter le développement économique, mais plusieurs arrangements institutionnels ont été mis en place pour gouverner l'usage de l'eau souterraine. Au fil du temps, plusieurs problèmes relatifs aux eaux souterraines sont apparus. Deux proches explications proches pour ceux-ci ont été explorées. Les ressources d'eau de surface ont été les premières à être développées, et les arrangements institutionnels pour l'allocation des eaux de surface ont été les premiers à être divisés. Ces arrangements ne conviennent pas particulièrement bien aux autorités des eaux souterraines. De plus, les différences physiques entre les rivières et les aquifères ont mené à des différences dans le développement de chaque type d'eau, et dans la production et l'organisation des coûts. Le développement de l'eau souterraine nécessite des lois sur les cots de production que chaque utilisateur de l'eau peut couvrir. Dés lors que les utilisateurs de l'eau souterraine ont individuellement investi dans des activités productrice, des problèmes émergent, tels que la baisse des niveaux d'eau. Ainsi, comme pour les utilisateurs d'eau de surface, les utilisateurs d'eau souterraine sont confrontés à la conception des arrangements constitutionnels pour coordonner l'utilisation qu'ils font de l'eau, après avoir inventés et développés leurs activité économique productive. La plus part des états de l'Ouest régulent le pompage, bien qu'en général l'utilisation des eaux souterraines, en général, résiste aux limites de pompage. La discussion conclut sur des propositions permettant de modifier la doctrine d'appropriation, pour ainsi mieux accommoder la gestion active des bassins d'eau souterraine à une durabilité sur le long terme.En las últimas décadas los usuarios de agua del occidente de Estados Unidos se han vuelto ascendentemente hacia los recursos de agua subterránea para apoyar el desarrollo económico, aunque pocos convenios institucionales estaban disponibles para regular el uso del agua subterránea. Con el tiempo han emergido numerosos problemas de agua subterránea. Se exploran dos explicaciones estrechamente relacionadas para estos problemas. Las fuentes de agua superficial fueron las primeras en ser desarrolladas y los convenios institucionales para distribuir el agua superficial fueron los primeros en ser concebidos. Estos convenios no están bien adaptados para la gobernabilidad del agua subterránea. Además, las diferencias físicas entre ríos y acuíferos lleva a diferencias en el desarrollo de cada tipo de agua, y en la producción y costos de organización. El desarrollo del agua subterránea involucra costos iniciales de producción bajos que los usuarios individuales de agua pueden cubrir. Media vez los usuarios de agua subterránea han invertido individualmente en actividades productivas emergen problemas tal como niveles de agua descendentes. De este modo, a diferencia de usuarios de agua superficial, los usuarios de agua subterránea se enfrentan con el reto de diseñar convenios institucionales para coordinar sus usos del agua después de que han invertido y desarrollado actividades económicas productivas. La mayoría de estados del occidente regulan el bombeo aunque los usuarios de agua subterránea, en general, se resisten a los límites de bombeo. La discusión concluye con propuestas para modificar la doctrina de apropiación anterior para una mejor adaptación de la gestión activa de las cuencas de agua subterránea para sostenibilidad a largo plazo. |
| Starting Page | 350 |
| Ending Page | 360 |
| Page Count | 11 |
| File Format | |
| ISSN | 14312174 |
| Journal | Hydrogeology Journal |
| Volume Number | 14 |
| Issue Number | 3 |
| e-ISSN | 14350157 |
| Language | English |
| Publisher | Springer-Verlag |
| Publisher Date | 2006-02-21 |
| Publisher Institution | International Association of Hydrogeologists |
| Publisher Place | Berlin, Heidelberg |
| Access Restriction | One Nation One Subscription (ONOS) |
| Subject Keyword | Legislation Groundwater development Groundwater/surface-water relations Western United States |
| Content Type | Text |
| Resource Type | Article |
| Subject | Earth and Planetary Sciences Water Science and Technology |
National Digital Library of India (NDLI) is a virtual repository of learning resources which is not just a repository with search/browse facilities but provides a host of services for the learner community. It is sponsored and mentored by Ministry of Education, Government of India, through its National Mission on Education through Information and Communication Technology (NMEICT). Filtered and federated searching is employed to facilitate focused searching so that learners can find the right resource with least effort and in minimum time. NDLI provides user group-specific services such as Examination Preparatory for School and College students and job aspirants. Services for Researchers and general learners are also provided. NDLI is designed to hold content of any language and provides interface support for 10 most widely used Indian languages. It is built to provide support for all academic levels including researchers and life-long learners, all disciplines, all popular forms of access devices and differently-abled learners. It is designed to enable people to learn and prepare from best practices from all over the world and to facilitate researchers to perform inter-linked exploration from multiple sources. It is developed, operated and maintained from Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur.
Learn more about this project from here.
NDLI is a conglomeration of freely available or institutionally contributed or donated or publisher managed contents. Almost all these contents are hosted and accessed from respective sources. The responsibility for authenticity, relevance, completeness, accuracy, reliability and suitability of these contents rests with the respective organization and NDLI has no responsibility or liability for these. Every effort is made to keep the NDLI portal up and running smoothly unless there are some unavoidable technical issues.
Ministry of Education, through its National Mission on Education through Information and Communication Technology (NMEICT), has sponsored and funded the National Digital Library of India (NDLI) project.
| Sl. | Authority | Responsibilities | Communication Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education |
Sanctioning Authority | https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives |
| 2 | Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur | Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project | https://www.iitkgp.ac.in |
| 3 | National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur | The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project | Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in |
| 4 | Project PI / Joint PI | Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project |
Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon |
| 5 | Website/Portal (Helpdesk) | Queries regarding NDLI and its services | support@ndl.gov.in |
| 6 | Contents and Copyright Issues | Queries related to content curation and copyright issues | content@ndl.gov.in |
| 7 | National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club) | Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach | clubsupport@ndl.gov.in |
| 8 | Digital Preservation Centre (DPC) | Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books | dpc@ndl.gov.in |
| 9 | IDR Setup or Support | Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops | idr@ndl.gov.in |
|
Loading...
|