Loading...
Please wait, while we are loading the content...
Similar Documents
Planned caesarean section had lower risk for perinatal morbidity and mortality than planned vaginal birth in breech presentation
| Content Provider | Semantic Scholar |
|---|---|
| Author | Nikodem, Cheryl |
| Copyright Year | 2001 |
| Abstract | (2000) Lancet 356, 1375. Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, et al, . for the Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. . Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. . Oct 21; . : . –83 . [OpenUrl][1][CrossRef][2][PubMed][3][Web of Science][4] QUESTION: In pregnant women with breech presentation, is planned caesarean section (CS) better than planned vaginal birth (VB)? Randomised (allocation concealed*), unblinded,* controlled trial with 6 weeks postpartum follow up. 121 centres in 26 countries. 2088 pregnant women who had a singleton live fetus in a frank or complete breech presentation at ≥37 weeks of gestation. Exclusion criteria were fetopelvic disproportion, fetus estimated to be clinically large or ≥4000 g, hyperextension of the fetal head, fetal anomaly or risk for mechanical problems at delivery, or contraindication for labour or vaginal delivery. 2083 women and infants (99.8%) had complete follow up. Women were allocated to planned CS (n=1043) or planned VB (n=1045). Women in the CS group were scheduled for a CS at ≥38 weeks of gestation. Women in … [1]: {openurl}?query=rft.jtitle%253DLancet%26rft.stitle%253DLancet%26rft.aulast%253DHannah%26rft.auinit1%253DM.%2BE.%26rft.volume%253D356%26rft.issue%253D9239%26rft.spage%253D1375%26rft.epage%253D1383%26rft.atitle%253DPlanned%2Bcaesarean%2Bsection%2Bversus%2Bplanned%2Bvaginal%2Bbirth%2Bfor%2Bbreech%2Bpresentation%2Bat%2Bterm%253A%2Ba%2Brandomised%2Bmulticentre%2Btrial.%2BTerm%2BBreech%2BTrial%2BCollaborative%2BGroup.%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Adoi%252F10.1016%252FS0140-6736%252800%252902840-3%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Apmid%252F11052579%26rft.genre%253Darticle%26rft_val_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Ajournal%26ctx_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ctx_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Actx [2]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02840-3&link_type=DOI [3]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=11052579&link_type=MED&atom=%2Febmed%2F6%2F3%2F73.atom [4]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=000089976100010&link_type=ISI |
| Starting Page | 73 |
| Ending Page | 73 |
| Page Count | 1 |
| File Format | PDF HTM / HTML |
| DOI | 10.1136/ebm.6.3.73 |
| Alternate Webpage(s) | http://acpjc.acponline.org/Content/pdf/ACPJC-2001-134-3-112.pdf |
| Alternate Webpage(s) | https://doi.org/10.1136/ebm.6.3.73 |
| Volume Number | 6 |
| Language | English |
| Access Restriction | Open |
| Content Type | Text |
| Resource Type | Article |
