Loading...
Please wait, while we are loading the content...
The patients’ perspective on urethral bulking agents and mid-urethral sling surgery as a primary treatment option for stress urinary incontinence.
| Content Provider | Semantic Scholar |
|---|---|
| Author | Casteleijn, Fenne M. Zwolsman, Sandra Roovers, Jan-Paul W. R. |
| Copyright Year | 2017 |
| Abstract | Conclusion Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a major public health issue. While physicians are keen on proposing the treatment with the highest cure rate, patients might attach more value to a less invasive procedure. The patient’s perspective towards urethral bulking agent (UBA) therapy as compared to the standard midurethral sling (MUS) surgery is underexplored. However, this is necessary for optimal shared-decision making. We aimed to explore the patient’s motives that determine their preference for UBA treatment or MUS-surgery. |
| File Format | PDF HTM / HTML |
| DOI | 10.26226/morressier.59b63e41d462b802923894cc |
| Alternate Webpage(s) | https://www.ics.org/Abstracts/Publish/349/000401_poster_20170711_141437.pdf |
| Alternate Webpage(s) | https://doi.org/10.26226/morressier.59b63e41d462b802923894cc |
| Language | English |
| Access Restriction | Open |
| Content Type | Text |
| Resource Type | Article |