Loading...
Please wait, while we are loading the content...
Similar Documents
Spinal cord stimulation versus repeated lumbosacral spine surgery for chronic pain: a randomized, controlled trial.
| Content Provider | Semantic Scholar |
|---|---|
| Author | Kidd, David H. Farrokhi, Farrokh R. Piantadosi, Steven |
| Copyright Year | 2005 |
| Abstract | OBJECTIVE Persistent or recurrent radicular pain after lumbosacral spine surgery is often associated with nerve root compression and is treated by repeated operation or, as a last resort, by spinal cord stimulation (SCS). We conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled trial to test our hypothesis that SCS is more likely than reoperation to result in a successful outcome by standard measures of pain relief and treatment outcome, including subsequent use of health care resources. METHODS For an average of 3 years postoperatively, disinterested third-party interviewers followed 50 patients selected for reoperation by standard criteria and randomized to SCS or reoperation. If the results of the randomized treatment were unsatisfactory, patients could cross over to the alternative. Success was based on self-reported pain relief and patient satisfaction. Crossover to the alternative procedure was an outcome measure. Use of analgesics, activities of daily living, and work status were self-reported. RESULTS Among 45 patients (90%) available for follow-up, SCS was more successful than reoperation (9 of 19 patients versus 3 of 26 patients, P <0.01). Patients initially randomized to SCS were significantly less likely to cross over than were those randomized to reoperation (5 of 24 patients versus 14 of 26 patients, P=0.02). Patients randomized to reoperation required increased opiate analgesics significantly more often than those randomized to SCS (P <0.025). Other measures of activities of daily living and work status did not differ significantly. CONCLUSION SCS is more effective than reoperation as a treatment for persistent radicular pain after lumbosacral spine surgery, and in the great majority of patients, it obviates the need for reoperation. |
| Starting Page | 2620 |
| Ending Page | 2625 |
| Page Count | 6 |
| File Format | PDF HTM / HTML |
| Alternate Webpage(s) | https://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.alaskachiropracticsociety.com/resource/resmgr/Journal_Club/SCS_vs._Reoperation_for_FBSS.pdf |
| PubMed reference number | 15617591v1 |
| Volume Number | 56 |
| Issue Number | 1 |
| Journal | Neurosurgery |
| Language | English |
| Access Restriction | Open |
| Subject Keyword | Analgesics Chronic pain Compression of spinal cord Crossing Over, Genetic Eichsfeld type congenital muscular dystrophy Health Care Lumbosacral spine Nerve Root Compression Neurostimulation procedures of spinal cord tissue Opiates Outcome Measures Pain relief Patients Repeat Surgery Spinal Cord Neoplasms radicular pain |
| Content Type | Text |
| Resource Type | Article |
