Loading...
Please wait, while we are loading the content...
Similar Documents
What can Evaluative Learning tell us about Implicit Learning
| Content Provider | Semantic Scholar |
|---|---|
| Author | Reuter, Bob Cleeremans, Axel |
| Copyright Year | 2000 |
| Abstract | Procedure. Our experimental procedure was based on EL studies conducted by Baeyens et al. (1988). Stage 1 Baseline Assessment: Ss were presented with 70 randomly ordered images of human faces with a rating scale positioned on the right. The scale ranged from -100 (dislike) through 0 (neutral) to +100 (liked), in intervals of 10. Ss were instructed to give their spontaneous affective evaluation (ER1) of the human faces by pointing the mouse cursor at the scores on the scale and then clicking. After giving task instructions, the experimenter left the room, so that Ss would rate the faces unobserved. Stage 2 Acquisition: The 6 (2 x 3) pictures that had received the highest and lowest baseline scores were used as Best (B) and Worst (W) stimuli respectively. The 18 pictures that were evaluated closest to 0 were used as Neutral stimuli (NSi). 12 stimulus pairs (6 Neutral-Neutral, 3 Neutral-Liked, 3 NeutralDisliked) were constructed by randomly assigning an NS to an NS (N1-N2), B (NB-B) or W (NW-W). Each stimulus pair was shown 10 times in random order. Ss were told to attend to the centre of the computer screen were they would see pairs of human faces, sequentially presented, and to evaluate the perceptual similarity of the face pairs on a 7-point Likert scale. Stage 3 Post-Acquisition Assessment: Finally, Ss were told to give their current, spontaneous affective evaluation of the whole set of 70 pictures again, using the same response system as in stage 1. This measure is called ER2. |
| File Format | PDF HTM / HTML |
| Alternate Webpage(s) | http://orbilu.uni.lu/bitstream/10993/38844/1/2000-ESCOP_SS-reuter-poster.pdf |
| Language | English |
| Access Restriction | Open |
| Content Type | Text |
| Resource Type | Article |
