Loading...
Please wait, while we are loading the content...
Similar Documents
Argumentation and Proof : a Discussion about Toulmin ' S and Duval ' S Models
| Content Provider | Semantic Scholar |
|---|---|
| Author | Barrieri, Th. Mathéii, A.-C. Durand-Guerrieriii, V. |
| Copyright Year | 2010 |
| Abstract | In this paper, we discuss the idea of a gap between argumentation and proof, an idea we think to be prevailing in the educational institution. Our claim is that the only use of propositional calculus is insufficient to the analysis of the validation process in mathematics and could artificially reinforce that idea of a gap. This claim can be understood as a criticism of Toulmin’s and Duval’s model, a criticism we hope to be a constructive one. We are then brought to the following proposal: taking explicitly into account the logical quantification and the mathematical objects in the models could help to explain mathematical creativity. |
| File Format | PDF HTM / HTML |
| Alternate Webpage(s) | http://ife.ens-lyon.fr/publications/edition-electronique/cerme6/wg2-02-barrier-durand-guerrier.pdf |
| Language | English |
| Access Restriction | Open |
| Content Type | Text |
| Resource Type | Discussion |
