Loading...
Please wait, while we are loading the content...
Similar Documents
Evaluation of partially acidulated phosphate fertilisers and reactive phosphate rock for hill pastures
| Content Provider | Semantic Scholar |
|---|---|
| Author | Mackay, Alec D. Wewala, Gayathri |
| Copyright Year | 2005 |
| Abstract | The initial and residual effectiveness of two partially acidulated fertilisers, a single superphosphate (SSP): reactive phosphate rock (RPR) physical mix (SSP:RPR) and a partially acidulated phosphate rock (PAPR), and a RPR, North Carolina, were compared with SSP at two phosphate (P)-responsive sites in hill country. One site had received small annual inputs of SSP (125 kg ha−1 y−1) fertiliser for 10 years (LF) and the other site no SSP in the past 5 years (NF). The SSP, PAPR and RPR were applied at 3 rates (20, 40 and 60 kg P ha−1) and SSP:RPR at one rate (40 kg P ha−1) once only in the first year. Fertiliser treatments were applied with or without ‘Grasslands Huia’ white clover (Trifolium repens L.) seed. Initial and residual pasture and legume responses were measured over two years.In the first year, pasture and legume response to applied P was much greater at the LF than NF site. A deterioration in legume content and vigour brought about by withholding fertiliser, rather than a difference in soil-fertiliser reactions, appears to be the main reason for the different response at the two sites in the first year. At the LF site the fully (SSP) and partially (SSP:RPR and PAPR) acidulated fertilisers were far more effective in stimulating legume growth than the RPR, while at the NF site no differences in pasture or legume production were found between fertilisers in the first year. Where fertiliser has been withheld for a number of years the use of SSP appears to be a wasteful and inefficient use of a processed fertiliser.Residual effects of RPR were greater than those of SSP, as shown by the greater yield of legume at both sites in the second year. The residual effectiveness of both the partially acidulated materials was much less than that of the RPR. Mixing and sowing white clover with the fertilisers had some beneficial effects on legume content at the NF site in both years and improved legume production at this site in the second year. |
| Starting Page | 149 |
| Ending Page | 156 |
| Page Count | 8 |
| File Format | PDF HTM / HTML |
| DOI | 10.1007/BF01087424 |
| Volume Number | 21 |
| Alternate Webpage(s) | https://page-one.springer.com/pdf/preview/10.1007/BF01087424 |
| Alternate Webpage(s) | https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01087424 |
| Journal | Fertilizer research |
| Language | English |
| Access Restriction | Open |
| Content Type | Text |
| Resource Type | Article |
