Loading...
Please wait, while we are loading the content...
Similar Documents
Problems in Psychiatric Genetic Research: A Reply to Faraone and Biederman.
| Content Provider | Semantic Scholar |
|---|---|
| Author | Joseph, Jay Ashvin |
| Copyright Year | 2000 |
| Abstract | Abstract A previous paper (Joseph, 2000) discussed the lack of evidence supporting genetic influences on behaviors given the label “attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder” (ADHD). Faraone and Biederman (2000) subjected this paper to a critical analysis, writing that Joseph's review “is based on errors in scientific logic compromised by an incomplete review of relevant data.” The present paper answers the most important criticisms by Faraone and Biederman. It is reiterated that possible genetic and environmental influences in both ADHD family and twin studies are confounded, and therefore no inferences about genetic factors can be drawn from these studies. In addition, several invalidating flaws of ADHD adoption studies are briefly reviewed. Problems with ADHD segregation analyses and molecular genetic studies are also highlighted. These studies were mentioned by Faraone and Biederman in the context of Joseph's alleged “incomplete literature review.” Additional topics include the appropriateness of using psychotropic drugs to treat children diagnosed with ADHD, past social and political misuse of the findings of genetic research, and alternative explanations for ADHD-type behavior. It is concluded that Joseph's previous position—that the available evidence does not support a genetic basis for ADHD—is sustained. |
| Starting Page | 582 |
| Ending Page | 593 |
| Page Count | 12 |
| File Format | PDF HTM / HTML |
| DOI | 10.1006/drev.2000.0518 |
| Volume Number | 20 |
| Alternate Webpage(s) | http://www.jayjoseph.net/files/ADHD_Reply.pdf |
| Alternate Webpage(s) | https://doi.org/10.1006/drev.2000.0518 |
| Language | English |
| Access Restriction | Open |
| Content Type | Text |
| Resource Type | Article |