Loading...
Please wait, while we are loading the content...
Comparing transition-edge sensor response times in a modified contact scheme with different support beams
| Content Provider | Semantic Scholar |
|---|---|
| Author | Beyer, Andrew D. Kenyon, Matthew Bumble, Bruce Runyan, Marcus C. Echternach, P. E. Holmes, Warren A. Bock, J. J. |
| Copyright Year | 2014 |
| Abstract | We present measurements of the thermal conductance, G, and effective time constants, , of three transition-edge sensors (TESs) populated in arrays operated from 80-87mK with TC~120mK . Our TES arrays include several variations of thermal architecture enabling determination of the architecture that demonstrates the minimum noise equivalent power (NEP), the lowest , and the trade-offs among designs. The three TESs we report here have identical Mo/Cu bilayer thermistors and wiring structures, while the thermal architectures are: 1) a TES with straight support beams of 1mm length, 2) a TES with meander support beams of total length 2mm and with 2 phononfilter blocks per beam, and 3) a TES with meander support beams of total length 2mm and with 6 phonon-filter blocks per beam. Our wiring scheme aims to lower the thermistor normal state resistance RN and increase the sharpness of the transition =dlogR/dlogT at the transition temperature TC. We find an upper limit of given by (25+10), and G values of 200fW/K for 1), 15fW/K for 2), and 10fW/K for 3). The value of can be improved by slightly increasing the length of our thermistors. PACS numbers: 85.25.Pb; 95.85.-e; 85.25.-j |
| File Format | PDF HTM / HTML |
| Alternate Webpage(s) | https://trs.jpl.nasa.gov/bitstream/handle/2014/44417/13-4928_A1b.pdf?isAllowed=y&sequence=1 |
| Language | English |
| Access Restriction | Open |
| Content Type | Text |
| Resource Type | Article |