Loading...
Please wait, while we are loading the content...
Similar Documents
Comparison of Diagnostic Methodology for Meniscal Pathology in the ACL Transection Canine Model
| Content Provider | Semantic Scholar |
|---|---|
| Copyright Year | 2009 |
| Abstract | Introduction –Animal models have been utilized extensively for meniscal disease research. The anterior cruciate ligament transection (ACLt) model is a commonly used canine model of osteoarthritis and the resultant knee instability often leads to naturally occurring medial meniscal injury. However, the ability to monitor the development and progression of meniscal injury can be as challenging in the ACLt model as it is in the clinical patient. The optimal diagnostic method should be minimally invasive, cost effective, efficient, accurate, and clinically relevant. Advanced imaging techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasonography are promising minimally invasive techniques to evaluate the development and progression of meniscal injury in the animal model. MRI is a sensitive diagnostic tool, but is costly and may not be available for use in animal model studies. Ultrasonography is more cost effective and widely available compared to MRI, however the reported accuracy for meniscal ultrasonography varies widely. Most studies evaluating the effectiveness of MRI and ultrasonography for meniscal imaging use arthroscopic examination as the gold standard. A comprehensive assessment of meniscal pathology including ex vivo gross and histologic examination in direct comparison to these imaging modalities has not been performed. The purpose of this study was to compare histology, ultrasonography, arthroscopy, and MRI of the ACLt canine medial meniscus using comprehensive gross examination as the gold standard. We hypothesized that each of the diagnostic modalities would have a strong (r>0.7) positive correlation to the gold standard measure of presence and severity of meniscal pathology. Further, we hypothesized that ultrasound would not significantly differ in sensitivity and specificity for diagnostic meniscal imaging compared to MRI for the ACLt canine model. Materials and Methods – All procedures were in accordance with the University Animal Care and Use Committee. Twenty-one purpose-bred hound dogs were used for a blinded prospective parent study evaluating a proprietary compound for treatment of osteoarthritis. All dogs underwent right knee MRI, arthroscopic exploration and ACL transection, leaving the left limb as the unoperated control. The dogs were leash-walked ten minutes per day for eight weeks, during which time they received either the experimental compound or placebo twice daily per os. Eight weeks post-operatively, MRI and second-look arthroscopy were performed on the operated knee, and ultrasound examinations were performed on both knees. For both time points, knee MR images were acquired with a 1.5T magnet and sequences included: 3D spoiled gradient with fat suppression, T2W 3D gradient recalled echo, and Fast Fat Suppressed Dual Echo Spin Echo. Ultrasonographic examination was performed using a 12-14 Mhz high-resolution probe. Sonographic inspection of the menisci included evaluation for displacement, echogenicity, and shape as well as presence of joint effusion, synovial thickening, and osteophytosis. Arthroscopy was performed with a 2.7mm 30 foreoblique arthroscope with digital image capture using both anteriomedial and anteriolateral portals to examine all major intra-articular structures in all joint compartments. Eight weeks after ACL transection, dogs were humanely euthanatized. Both hind limbs were disarticulated at the knee joint and the menisci were carefully removed for gross inspection and further processing. Gross and arthroscopic meniscal inspection and scoring were performed by one surgeon (JLC) and sonographic and MRI examination and scoring were performed by one radiologist (CRC), both of whom were blinded to dog number and treatment group. For all outcome measures, menisci were subjectively scored for presence and severity of pathology in the anterior horn, body, and posterior horn using a 4-point scale: 0-normal, 1minimal tearing or fraying, 2-mild tearing or fraying, 3-moderate tearing or fraying, 4-severe tearing or fraying. Statistical analyses for significant differences (p<0.05) between groups and strength of correlations among outcome measures were performed. Results – By both gross and arthroscopic scoring, medial menisci had significantly more frequent and severe damage than lateral menisci (p<0.001). A predominance of medial meniscal pathology was limited to the posterior horn; therefore, statistical analyses were performed only for the posterior medial meniscus. There were strong and significant positive correlations between gross, histopathologic, arthroscopic, MRI and sonographic imaging of the posterior medial meniscus (Table 1). Using gross examination as the gold standard, arthroscopy was more sensitive than ultrasonography and had higher specificity and positive and negative predictive values than both MRI and ultrasonography. MRI was highly sensitive, but not specific, for detection of posterior medial meniscal pathology in this study (Table 2). Ultrasonography more consistently correctly diagnosed the presence of posterior medial meniscal pathology than MRI. Arthroscopy was 3.3 times more likely than ultrasound and 4.7 times more likely than MRI to correctly diagnose the presence or absence of gross pathology of the medial meniscus of dogs eight weeks post ACLt; however, these differences were not statistically significant using the Chi-Square test (p=0.34). There were no significant differences with respect to presence or severity of meniscal pathology between treatment (experimental compound) and control (placebo) groups for any outcome measure (p>0.37). |
| File Format | PDF HTM / HTML |
| Alternate Webpage(s) | http://www.ors.org/Transactions/55/2151.pdf |
| Language | English |
| Access Restriction | Open |
| Content Type | Text |
| Resource Type | Article |
