Loading...
Please wait, while we are loading the content...
Similar Documents
Author ' s response to reviews Title : Low coverage and poor quality of postnatal care in rural Hebei , China : a mixed method research
| Content Provider | Semantic Scholar |
|---|---|
| Author | Wu, Qiong Zhang, Yanfeng |
| Copyright Year | 2013 |
| Abstract | Background: In line 2 the authors state that postnatal care is poor in China, I think this was the research question and should not be stated in abstract even if this study was performed in one part of China only. Response: To reflect on reviewer’s comment, we now changed the sentence into “However, coverage and quality of postnatal care are poor in low and middle-income countries”. The aim is .” Conclusion: The first part is the conclusion of the study, whereas the second part describes what the authors think should be done. The authors should stay at the conclusions of the study and not describe clinical implications since this was not the aim of this study to find out. Response: We appreciate this comment and we deleted the implication from the conclusion. Manuscript Methods: This is where I think an effort should be made to describe what was the method for this particular study and not for the whole research project. The criteria for selecting the 1601 participants are not clear. The description of the larger project includes power calculations for outcomes not presented in this paper and should therefore be excluded. A reference to another study from the larger project is enough information here and then the focus should be on the selection, the research process and analysis of this study. Response: We appreciate reviewer’s comment. The quantitative study was part of the whole |
| File Format | PDF HTM / HTML |
| Alternate Webpage(s) | https://static-content.springer.com/openpeerreview/art:10.1186%2F1471-2393-14-31/12884_2013_914_ReviewerReport_V2_R3.pdf |
| Alternate Webpage(s) | https://static-content.springer.com/openpeerreview/art:10.1186%2F1471-2393-14-31/12884_2013_914_ReviewerReport_V1_R2.pdf |
| Alternate Webpage(s) | https://static-content.springer.com/openpeerreview/art:10.1186%2F1471-2393-14-31/12884_2013_914_AuthorComment_V2.pdf |
| Alternate Webpage(s) | https://static-content.springer.com/openpeerreview/art:10.1186%2F1471-2393-14-31/12884_2013_914_ReviewerReport_V1_R1.pdf |
| Alternate Webpage(s) | https://static-content.springer.com/openpeerreview/art:10.1186%2F1471-2393-14-31/12884_2013_914_ReviewerReport_V2_R2.pdf |
| Alternate Webpage(s) | https://static-content.springer.com/openpeerreview/art:10.1186%2F1471-2393-14-31/12884_2013_914_ReviewerReport_V1_R3.pdf |
| Language | English |
| Access Restriction | Open |
| Content Type | Text |
