Loading...
Please wait, while we are loading the content...
Similar Documents
STUDI MANAJEMEN RISIKO KETERLAMBATAN WAKTU PENYELESAIAN PEKERJAAN (Studi Kasus Pada Balai Wilayah Sungai Sumatera V)
| Content Provider | Semantic Scholar |
|---|---|
| Author | Syatriawan Zaidir Bakar, Yusrizal |
| Copyright Year | 2015 |
| Abstract | This study aims to determine the exact cause of the dominant factors in the delays in completion of the work which has been held throughout the last three years and the level of risk posed by each cause. Risk can be said to be a result that may occur unexpectedly. Although some activities have been planned as possible, but still contains uncertainties that will be run entirely according to plan. Risk on construction projects however can't be eliminated but can be reduced or transferred from one party to the other party. The actors in the construction industry is now increasingly aware of the importance of considering the problem of risk on projects handled, due to errors in predicting and addressing the risk would have a negative impact, either directly or indirectly in the construction project. Moving on from this condition, the need for an analysis relating to the initial objectives of the risk management of construction projects aimed at reducing the risk and impact of risk will occur. The results of the analysis using factor analysis concludes that there are three dimensions of fifty variables derived from the five factors as causes of low performance cost performance on projects implemented last three years, including the indecision in giving authority and responsibility to manage the project (x1), wrong in applying the methods of work (X29); and one in monitoring and controlling risk (x42). Overall these three variables contributing causes low achievement of project completion time performance based on the coefficient of determination was 81.5% and the remainder caused by other variables. As for the level of risk of these three variables is 20.61% comes from wrong in applying the methods of work (X29); 18.60% comes from indecision in giving authority and responsibility to manage the project (x1); and 16:29% came from one of the monitoring and control of risk (x42). Keywords: Performance, Risk Level Project |
| File Format | PDF HTM / HTML |
| Volume Number | 6 |
| Alternate Webpage(s) | http://www.ejurnal.bunghatta.ac.id/index.php?journal=JPSC2&op=download&page=article&path%5B%5D=6474&path%5B%5D=5475 |
| Language | English |
| Access Restriction | Open |
| Content Type | Text |
| Resource Type | Article |
