Princípio da responsabilidade objetiva vigente nas normas antidoping e os direitos humanos dos atletas: uma abordagem crítica

Content Provider	Semantic Scholar
Author	Cunha, Renata Da Cruz Nunes, Rodolfo De Alkmim Moreira Novaes, Giovanni Da Silva Knackfuss, Maria Irany Miranda, Hênio Ferreira De Cavalcanti, Francisco Ivo Dantas
Copyright Year	2008
Abstract	Back Ground: the human lives in search of overrun at all levels, whether professional, emotional or in their interpersonal relationships. In the middle of sports this search becomes more visible, because hundredths of seconds can make the difference between the podium and the failure. Journals at any moment announces a new case of a positive doping in several sports. Objective: analyse the processes judged for doping in the STJD of the Brazilian athletism and verify if the pronounced sentences are in accordance with the Brazilian Constitution and with the Universal Declaration of the Human Rights. Materials and Methods: 18 cases were reviewed by the use of prohibited substance, between the years 2003 to 2006 by the STJD of Athletism. Results: of the 18 cases examined only 3 were acquitted by the STJD, however, these three, two have met suspension for two years, in order that WADA, not satisfied with the results asked the International Federation (IAAF) to analyze them, and after guided them to the Court of Arbitration Sports (CAS). Conclusion: the rule of objective responsibility are not in accordance with the Brazilian Constitution and with the Universal Declaration of the Human Rights, leading athletes to respond irrespective proven their guilt.
Starting Page	83
Ending Page	86
Page Count	4
File Format	PDF HTM / HTML
DOI	10.6063/motricidade.4(1).527
Volume Number	4
Alternate Webpage(s)	http://www.scielo.mec.pt/pdf/mot/v4n1/v4n1a11.pdf
Alternate Webpage(s)	https://doi.org/10.6063/motricidade.4%281%29.527
Language	English
Access Restriction	Open
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Article