Loading...
Please wait, while we are loading the content...
Similar Documents
A solution to Frege's puzzle
| Content Provider | Semantic Scholar |
|---|---|
| Author | Bealer, George |
| Copyright Year | 1993 |
| Abstract | My view that the English sentence 'Hesperus is Phosphorus' could sometimes be used to raise an empirical issue while 'Hesperus is Hesperus' could not shows that I do not treat the sentences as completely interchangeable. Further, it indicates that the mode of fixing the reference is relevant to our epistemic attitude toward the sentences expressed. How this relates to the question what 'propositions' are expressed by these sentences, whether these 'propositions' are objects of knowledge and belief, and in general, how to treat names in epistemic contexts, are vexing questions. I have no 'official doctrine' concerning them, and in fact I am unsure that the apparatus of 'propositions' does not break down in this area. Saul Kripke, Preface, Naming and Necessity |
| Starting Page | 17 |
| Ending Page | 17 |
| Page Count | 1 |
| File Format | PDF HTM / HTML |
| DOI | 10.2307/2214115 |
| Volume Number | 7 |
| Alternate Webpage(s) | https://philpapers.org/archive/BEAAST.pdf |
| Alternate Webpage(s) | https://doi.org/10.2307/2214115 |
| Language | English |
| Access Restriction | Open |
| Content Type | Text |
| Resource Type | Article |
