Loading...
Please wait, while we are loading the content...
Similar Documents
On Richard Carrier’s Doubts: A Response to Richard Carrier’s On the Historicity of Jesus: Why We Might Have Reason for Doubt
| Content Provider | Semantic Scholar |
|---|---|
| Author | Gullotta, Daniel N. |
| Copyright Year | 2017 |
| Abstract | The Jesus Myth theory is the view that the person known as Jesus of Nazareth had no historical existence. Throughout the centuries this view has had a few but notable adherents such as Bruno Bauer, Arthur Drews, G.A. Wells, and Robert M. Price. Recently, Richard Carrier’s work On the Historicity of Jesus (Sheffield Phoenix Press, 2014) has attempted to reexamine the question in a rigorous academic fashion. According to Carrier, within the earliest days of Christianity, Jesus was not understood as a historic-human figure, but rather as a celestial-angelic being, akin to Gabriel in Islam or to Moroni in Mormonism, and only came to be understood as a historical person later. While Carrier’s hypothesis is problematic and unpersuasive, there are several key points related to his work that this article specifically challenges and critiques. |
| Starting Page | 310 |
| Ending Page | 346 |
| Page Count | 37 |
| File Format | PDF HTM / HTML |
| DOI | 10.1163/17455197-01502009 |
| Volume Number | 15 |
| Alternate Webpage(s) | http://funscrapbooking.net/on/the/on-the-historicity-of-jesus-why-we-might-have-reason-for-doubt.pdf |
| Alternate Webpage(s) | https://doi.org/10.1163/17455197-01502009 |
| Language | English |
| Access Restriction | Open |
| Content Type | Text |
| Resource Type | Article |
