Loading...
Please wait, while we are loading the content...
Similar Documents
What differences in heterogeneity can tell us about research
| Content Provider | Semantic Scholar |
|---|---|
| Author | Stanley, Tommy Doucouliagos, Chris |
| Copyright Year | 2019 |
| Abstract | We are grateful to everyone for their willingness to discuss these important issues and to Andrew for sharing our comments on his website. Joe and Uri’s post offers a nice way to address the broader issues that lie at the center of social science research. Last Fall, MAER-Net (Meta-Analysis of Economics Research-Network) had a productive discussion about the replication ‘crisis,’ and how it could be turned into a credibility revolution. We examined the high heterogeneity revealed by our survey of over 12,000 psychological studies and how it implies that close replication is unlikely (Stanley et al., 2018). Marcel van Assen pointed out that the then recently-released, large-scale, multilab replication project, Many Labs 2 (Klein et al., 2018), “hardly show heterogeneity,” and Marcel claimed “it is a myth (and mystery) why researchers believe heterogeneity is omnipresent in psychology.” |
| File Format | PDF HTM / HTML |
| Alternate Webpage(s) | https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Stanley-DoucouliagosComment.pdf |
| Language | English |
| Access Restriction | Open |
| Content Type | Text |
| Resource Type | Article |
