Loading...
Please wait, while we are loading the content...
Similar Documents
In the Wake of a Veto: What Do Oregon Psychologists Think and Know about Prescription Privileges for Psychologists?
| Content Provider | Semantic Scholar |
|---|---|
| Author | Dolson, Robyn A. Tompkins, Tanya L. Hopping, Emily R. |
| Copyright Year | 2011 |
| Abstract | Disagree 32.1% Neither 16.0% Agree 3.7% Strongly Agree 2.5% Figure 2. I plan to obtain the necessary training and plan to prescribe medication Note. All of the items were measured on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Data are collapsed to reflect agreement, disagreement or neither. 'Do you think the benefits outweigh the costs' was measured on a 3-point scale (yes, no and undecided). Items highlighted in gold represent strong arguments while items highlighted in light purple represent weak arguments. Items left un-highlighted reflect no clear consensus. o Perceived familiarity with current training models revealed a lack of awareness of the Department of Defense (75.2%) and APA (72%) training models. In terms of actual knowledge, only 5% knew which three states/territories currently have prescriptive authority and 77% were unfamiliar with any of the prerequisites for postdoctoral training in psychopharmacology. o Arguments in favor of prescription privileges garnering the most support related to perceptions of improved access and treatment enhancement. In contrast, the strongest arguments against prescription privileges involved professional issues. Other arguments failed to be compelling or were met with mixed responses (see Table 1). These views underscore the complexity and discord in beliefs toward prescription privileges. |
| File Format | PDF HTM / HTML |
| Alternate Webpage(s) | https://digitalcommons.linfield.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1019&context=studsymp_sci |
| Language | English |
| Access Restriction | Open |
| Content Type | Text |
| Resource Type | Article |
