How to Overcome Strawson’s Point: Defending a Value-Oriented Foundation for Contractualism

Content Provider	Semantic Scholar
Author	Paletta, Douglas R.
Copyright Year	2013
Abstract	In The Second Person Standpoint, Darwall charges that all value-oriented foundations for ethics make a category mistake. Calling it Strawson’s point, he argues these foundations explain moral authority, which concerns whether someone has standing to hold another accountable, in terms of a value, which essentially concerns what makes the world go best. However, whether it would be good for me to blame you simply asks a different question than whether I have standing to blame you. I defend a valueoriented foundation for contractualism by identifying one way to overcome Strawson’s point. At bottom, Darwall’s objection relies on the assumption that all values are worldregarding. I argue that another class of values exists: second-personal values. Grounding morality in one of these values does not make the category mistake at the heart of Strawson’s point. In particular, I argue that grounding morality on one secondpersonal value, the ideal of acting justifiably towards others, better captures traditional contractualist ideals than Darwall’s formal foundation.
Starting Page	9
Ending Page	20
Page Count	12
File Format	PDF HTM / HTML
DOI	10.1007/s10677-011-9328-1
Alternate Webpage(s)	https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1014&context=miscellaneous_papers
Alternate Webpage(s)	https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-011-9328-1
Volume Number	16
Language	English
Access Restriction	Open
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Article