Loading...
Please wait, while we are loading the content...
Similar Documents
Why are some titanium silicalite-1 samples active and others not?
| Content Provider | Semantic Scholar |
|---|---|
| Author | Pol, A. Van Der Verduyn, Anthony Hooff, J. H. C. Van |
| Copyright Year | 1992 |
| Abstract | Titanium silicalite-1 samples of different particle size are synthesized. X-ray diffraction (XRD), infrared (IR),29Si magic angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance (MAS NMR), diffuse reflectance electron absorption spectrometry (DREAS), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), pore volume and particle size measurements are used to characterize these samples. In the hydroxylation of phenol with hydrogen peroxide large differences in activity are found between different TS-1 samples. Using XRD, IR,29Si MAS NMR, and DREAS measurements it is impossible to differentiate between active and less active samples. Particle size determination (directly by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Coulter Counter, and Malvern and indirectly by TGA and adsorption measurements) however can explain these differences. Smaller particles are more active than larger particles. From calculations of the Weisz modulus it can be concluded that large zeolite particle are not fully utilized because of pore diffusion limitations. The product distribution is also influenced by particle size. |
| Starting Page | 113 |
| Ending Page | 130 |
| Page Count | 18 |
| File Format | PDF HTM / HTML |
| DOI | 10.1016/0926-860X(92)80310-9 |
| Volume Number | 92 |
| Alternate Webpage(s) | https://pure.tue.nl/ws/files/2132678/621554.pdf |
| Alternate Webpage(s) | http://alexandria.tue.nl/repository/freearticles/621554.pdf |
| Alternate Webpage(s) | https://doi.org/10.1016/0926-860X%2892%2980310-9 |
| Language | English |
| Access Restriction | Open |
| Content Type | Text |
| Resource Type | Article |
