Loading...
Please wait, while we are loading the content...
Similar Documents
Are mental states assessed relative to what most people “should” or “would” think? Prescriptive and descriptive components of expected attitudes
| Content Provider | Semantic Scholar |
|---|---|
| Author | Kreps, Tamar A. Monin, Benoit |
| Copyright Year | 2010 |
| Abstract | For Knobe, observers evaluate mental states by comparing agents' statements with “defaults,” the attitudes they are expected to hold. In our analysis, Knobe's model relies primarily on what agents should think, and little on expectancies of what they would think. We show the importance and complexity of including descriptive and prescriptive norms if one is to take expectancies seriously. |
| Starting Page | 341 |
| Ending Page | 343 |
| Page Count | 3 |
| File Format | PDF HTM / HTML |
| DOI | 10.1017/S0140525X10001792 |
| Volume Number | 33 |
| Alternate Webpage(s) | http://psych.stanford.edu/~monin/papers/Kreps%20Monin%202010%20comment%20BBS.pdf |
| Alternate Webpage(s) | https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/sites/gsb/files/kreps_bbs.pdf |
| Alternate Webpage(s) | https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10001792 |
| Language | English |
| Access Restriction | Open |
| Content Type | Text |
| Resource Type | Article |
