Loading...
Please wait, while we are loading the content...
Similar Documents
Tools for assessing situational awareness in an operational fighter environment.
| Content Provider | Semantic Scholar |
|---|---|
| Author | Waag, Wayne L. Houck, Michael R. |
| Copyright Year | 1994 |
| Abstract | Three Situational Awareness Rating Scales (SARS) were developed to measure pilot performance in an operational fighter environment. These instruments rated situational awareness (SA) from three perspectives: supervisors, peers, and self-report. SARS data were gathered from 205 mission-ready USAF F-15C pilots from 8 operational squadrons. Reliabilities of the SARS were quite high, as measured by their internal consistency (0.95 to 0.99) and inter-rater agreement (0.88 to 0.97). Correlations between the supervisory and peer SARS were strongly positive (0.89 to 0.92), while correlations with the self-report SARS were positive, but smaller (0.45 to 0.57). A composite SA score was developed from the supervisory and peer SARS using a principal components analysis. The resulting score was found to be highly related to previous flight experience and current flight qualification. A prediction equation derived from available background and experience factors accounted for 73% of its variance. Implications for use of the composite SA score as a criterion measure are discussed. |
| File Format | PDF HTM / HTML |
| Alternate Webpage(s) | https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a486172.pdf |
| Alternate Webpage(s) | http://www.dtic.mil/get-tr-doc/pdf?AD=ADA486172&Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf |
| PubMed reference number | 8018073 |
| Journal | Medline |
| Volume Number | 65 |
| Issue Number | 5 |
| Journal | Aviation, space, and environmental medicine |
| Language | English |
| Access Restriction | Open |
| Content Type | Text |
| Resource Type | Article |
