Loading...
Please wait, while we are loading the content...
Similar Documents
Comparison of Ephedrine vs. Norepinephrine in Treating Anesthesia-Induced Hypotension in Hypertensive Patients: Randomized Double-Blinded Study
| Content Provider | Semantic Scholar |
|---|---|
| Author | Hassani, Valiollah Movaseghi, Gholamreza Safaeeyan, Reza Masghati, Sahar Yekta, Batool Ghorbani Rad, Reza Farahmand |
| Copyright Year | 2018 |
| Abstract | Background Hypotension is a common problem in general anesthesia. Maintaining the mean arterial pressure by choosing a vasopressor with minimal complications is still discussed in various surgeries. Objectives The aim of this study is comparison of ephedrine versus norepinephrine in treating anesthesia-induced hypotension in hypertensive patients in spinal surgery in a randomized double-blinded study. Methods This randomized, double-blinded study was approved by Iran University of Medical Sciences, operating room of medical center. Data collection was completed between Jan to Dec 2017. Inclusion criteria included age between 20 and 75 years, history of high blood pressure (a patient who has been treated for maximum 5 years with a anti hypertensive medication), and patients under general anesthesia in spinal surgery. The exclusion criteria were based on American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status of 3 or higher, history of arrhythmia, heart valve disease, cerebrovascular disease, kidney failure, beta-blocker use and diabetes, as well as intra operative massive blood loss. After initiation of anesthesia, when the pressure reaches less than 60, the patient entered the protocol and simultaneously administration of 5 mL/kg serum crystalloid and vasopressor. Patients were randomized to the ephedrine group (n = 28) who received 5 mg ephedrine intravenous (i.v.) or norepinephrine Group (n = 28) who received 10 µg (i.v.) bolus norepinephrine at anesthesia-induced hypotension. The administration of 5 mL/kg serum crystalloid and vasopressor was simultaneous. If the mean arterial pressure (MAP) had not reached 60 mmHg, the same dose should be repeated at a maximum of three or more times at five-minute intervals in the ephedrine group and at two minutes intervals in the norepinephrine group. All parameters were collected before and at the end of administration anesthesia drug and during episodes of hypotension. Hemodynamic variables, frequency of hypotension, and total number of vasopressors doses during anesthesia were recorded and analyzed. Results The mean number of hypotension times, the number of vasopressors doses in the first hypotension, the total number of doses consumed during the anesthesia, and heart rate at the end of anesthesia were lower in the norepinephrine group (P) respectively. MAP, 5 minutes after the first episode of hypotension and MAP at the end of anesthesia were higher in norepinephrine group. Conclusions Norepinephrine is more effective than ephedrine in maintenance of MAP in hypertensive patients undergoing spinal surgery under general anesthesia. |
| Starting Page | 18 |
| Ending Page | 25 |
| Page Count | 8 |
| File Format | PDF HTM / HTML |
| PubMed reference number | 30271750v1 |
| Alternate Webpage(s) | https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.79626 |
| DOI | 10.5812/aapm.79626 |
| Journal | Anesthesiology and pain medicine |
| Volume Number | 8 |
| Language | English |
| Access Restriction | Open |
| Subject Keyword | Adrenergic beta-Antagonists Antihypertensive Agents Blinded Cerebrovascular Disorders Data Collection Diabetes Mellitus Double-Blind Method Ephedrine Exclusion Heart Valves Heart valve disease Hemorrhage Hypertensive disease Hypotension, Controlled Kidney Diseases Kidney Failure Norepinephrine Operating Room Operative Surgical Procedures Patients Vasoconstrictor Agents beta Thalassemia crystalloid torr |
| Content Type | Text |
| Resource Type | Article |
