Loading...
Please wait, while we are loading the content...
How Can We Better Evaluate Complex Global Health Initiatives? Reflections From the January 2014 Institute of Medicine Workshop
| Content Provider | Semantic Scholar |
|---|---|
| Author | Mookherji, Sangeeta Meck, Kate |
| Copyright Year | 2015 |
| Abstract | An IOM workshop on evaluation design drew on recent evaluations of 4 complex initiatives (PEPFAR; the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, TB and Malaria; the President’s Malaria Initiative; and the Affordable Medicines Facility-malaria). Key components for good evaluations: (1) a robust theory of change to understand how and why programs should work; (2) use of multiple analytic methods; and (3) triangulation of evidence to validate and deepen understanding of results as well as synthesis of findings to identify lessons for scale-up or broader application. |
| Starting Page | 174 |
| Ending Page | 179 |
| Page Count | 6 |
| File Format | PDF HTM / HTML |
| DOI | 10.9745/GHSP-D-14-00184 |
| PubMed reference number | 26085016 |
| Journal | Medline |
| Volume Number | 3 |
| Alternate Webpage(s) | http://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/4c/a3/174.PMC4476857.pdf |
| Alternate Webpage(s) | http://hsrc.himmelfarb.gwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1156&context=sphhs_global_facpubs |
| Alternate Webpage(s) | https://hsrc.himmelfarb.gwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1181&context=sphhs_global_facpubs&httpsredir=1&referer= |
| Alternate Webpage(s) | https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-14-00184 |
| Journal | Global health, science and practice |
| Language | English |
| Access Restriction | Open |
| Content Type | Text |
| Resource Type | Article |
