Loading...
Please wait, while we are loading the content...
Gender differences in learning styles: a narrative review and a quantitative meta-analysis Severiens,
| Content Provider | Semantic Scholar |
|---|---|
| Author | Severiens |
| Copyright Year | 2005 |
| Abstract | This article reviews research on gender and learning styles of students, 18 and older, conducted after 1980. Curry's onion model (1983) is used to classify definitions of learning styles and to reconstruct the theoretical frameworks used. The extent to which learning style is considered stable or variable in different learning contexts determines its position in the model. Most studies used theoretical frameworks that belonged in the middle or outer layers of the model. This location indicates the strong influence of learning context on women's and men's learning styles. While there were differences between learning styles, research designs rarely included learning contexts. In addition to the narrative review, we performed a quantitative meta-analysis on two instruments (Kolb's Learning Style Inventory and Entwistle's Approaches to Studying Inventory) to determine the direction and magnitude of gender differences in various samples. A search for these two instruments resulted in 26 studies for which the necessary statistics were available. On Kolb's instrument, the results showed that men were more likely than women to prefer the abstract conceptualisation mode of learning. On Entwistle's ASIa difference was found on the affective components of approaches to studying. |
| File Format | PDF HTM / HTML |
| Alternate Webpage(s) | https://pure.uva.nl/ws/files/2202252/46930_216853y.pdf |
| Language | English |
| Access Restriction | Open |
| Content Type | Text |
| Resource Type | Article |
