Loading...
Please wait, while we are loading the content...
Similar Documents
Clinical utility of hereditary cancer panel testing: Impact of PALB2 , ATM , CHEK2 , NBN , BRIP1 , RAD51C , and RAD51D results on patient management and adherence to provider recommendations
| Content Provider | Scilit |
|---|---|
| Author | Vysotskaia, Valentina Kaseniit, K. Eerik Bucheit, Leslie Ready, Kaylene Price, Kristin Taber, Katherine Johansen |
| Copyright Year | 2019 |
| Description | Journal: Cancer Background Although management guidelines exist for several genes associated with a 2‐fold to 5‐fold increase in the relative risk for certain cancers, the value of testing for them remains controversial. Methods De‐identified personal and family history data for 654 individuals with pathogenic variants (PVs) in PALB2, ATM, CHEK2, NBN, BRIP1, RAD51C, and/or RAD51D were analyzed for pretest and post‐test candidacy for guideline‐recommended management of cancer risk. These individuals were invited to complete a survey about provider recommendations and their adherence. Results Twenty‐four percent of CHEK2, ATM, PALB2, or NBN PV carriers were appropriate for consideration of annual breast magnetic resonance imaging screening before genetic testing, with the remaining 76% appropriate only after testing. No BRIP1, RAD51C, or RAD51D PV carriers were appropriate for consideration of risk‐reducing salpingo‐oophorectomy before genetic testing; 100% were appropriate only after testing. Seventeen percent of CHEK2 PV carriers were appropriate for earlier and more frequent colonoscopy before genetic testing, with the remaining 83% appropriate only after testing. Provider recommendations for annual breast magnetic resonance imaging, consideration of risk‐reducing salpingo‐oophorectomy, and earlier and more frequent colonoscopy were reported by 42%, 26%, and 66% of breast, ovarian, and colorectal cancer risk PV carriers, respectively, before genetic testing, versus 82%, 79%, and 81%, respectively, after testing. Nearly all respondents had planned or undertaken provider‐recommended management. Conclusions Testing for PALB2, ATM, CHEK2, NBN, BRIP1, RAD51C, and RAD51D changed management for those carrying PVs. Provider recommendations were aligned with guidelines, and patients adhered to recommendations, both of which are critical for reducing both long‐term cancer morbidity and mortality. |
| Related Links | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7003834/pdf |
| Ending Page | 558 |
| Page Count | 10 |
| Starting Page | 549 |
| e-ISSN | 10970142 |
| DOI | 10.1002/cncr.32572 |
| Journal | Cancer |
| Issue Number | 3 |
| Volume Number | 126 |
| Language | English |
| Publisher | Wiley-Blackwell |
| Publisher Date | 2019-10-29 |
| Access Restriction | Open |
| Subject Keyword | Journal: Cancer Gastroenterology and Hepatology Obstetrics and Gynecology Breast Cancer Cancer Risk Colorectal Cancer Hereditary Cancer Ovarian Cancer |
| Content Type | Text |
| Resource Type | Article |
